2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal selection of autoregressive model coefficients for early damage detectability with an application to wind turbine blades

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study builds on and extends the authors' previous work presented in [8] and [28], where optimal selections of the initial and PCA-transformed time series-based DSFs were studied, respectively. The previous research demonstrated, via tracktable conceptual examples, and validated, through extensive numerical and experimental studies, that, depending on the correlation between the initial DSF components and their sensitivity to damage, different selections and projections of DSFs can be optimal for SDD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present study builds on and extends the authors' previous work presented in [8] and [28], where optimal selections of the initial and PCA-transformed time series-based DSFs were studied, respectively. The previous research demonstrated, via tracktable conceptual examples, and validated, through extensive numerical and experimental studies, that, depending on the correlation between the initial DSF components and their sensitivity to damage, different selections and projections of DSFs can be optimal for SDD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Damage sensitive features (DSFs) are extracted from vibration signals to reduce data volumes and to improve damage detectability. These DSFs are usually multivariate and include modal parameters [6], parametric time series model coefficients [7][8][9][10], and non-parametric time series representations in the frequency domain [11,12], time-frequency domain [13] or time domain. For the latter, amplitudes of cross-correlations [14] and their coefficients [15] or cross-correlations [16] and autocorrelations [17] at the zero lag were all proposed for SDD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…input–output vs output-only), a broad range of representations can be adopted to extract significant DSFs. Considering linear and stationary vibration data, widely used time-invariant linear models are the autoregressive (AR), 1820 autoregressive with exogenous input (ARX), 21 autoregressive moving average (ARMA), 22,23 autoregressive moving average with exogenous input (ARMAX), 24,25 and autoregressive and autoregressive with exogenous input (ARARX) 26 ones. However, vector-dependent functionally pooled (VFP) models, 27 Gaussian process (GP) time series models, 28 time-varying autoregressive moving average (TV-ARMA), 29 and trigonometric Box–Cox ARMA trend seasonal (TBATS) 30 are suitable for conditions that time series data are exposed to uncertainties, operational and environmental variability, ambient vibration, and seasonal variations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the second step, the fault isolation, is handled via Fuzzy/Bayesian network scheme classifying the kind of fault. Optimal selection of auto regressive model coefficients for early damage detects ability with an application to wind turbine blades was carried out by Hoell and Omenzetter [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%