41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference &Amp;amp; Exhibit 2005
DOI: 10.2514/6.2005-4485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Sensor Selection for Health Monitoring Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Santi (ref. 4) and Butas (ref. 10) proposed an approach where specific system health parameters from available simulations are extracted to establish a fault data reconciliation matrix.…”
Section: Fault Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Santi (ref. 4) and Butas (ref. 10) proposed an approach where specific system health parameters from available simulations are extracted to establish a fault data reconciliation matrix.…”
Section: Fault Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted by both Santi (ref. 13) and Musulin (ref. 10), the fidelity of the model utilized will impact the performance, health assessment, or data reconciliation, and therefore the sensor suite selection process.…”
Section: A Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13) utilized a high-fidelity dynamic model of a rocket propulsion system to generate a simplified linear model. Health parameters were identified within the linear model that represented specific fault conditions.…”
Section: Fault Detectability/fault Discriminabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…References [13][14][15][16][17] provide context for this section. For example, the Systematic Sensor Selection Strategy (S4) is a model-based procedure for systematically and quantitatively identifying the sensor compliment that optimally achieves the health assessment goals of a system.…”
Section: Intelligent Sensors and Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%