2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-006-0699-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal sequencing of rotation angles for five-axis machining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Munlin et al [6] tried to reduce the influences of singularity by optimally selecting the axis rotating angles from the multiple solutions of the inverse kinematics equations. Ivanenko et al [7] and Makhanov and Munlin [8] presented similar methods in their research studies, respectively. Srijuntongsiri and Makhanov [9] proposed a numerical algorithm to reduce the kinematic errors for the existing industrial G-codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Munlin et al [6] tried to reduce the influences of singularity by optimally selecting the axis rotating angles from the multiple solutions of the inverse kinematics equations. Ivanenko et al [7] and Makhanov and Munlin [8] presented similar methods in their research studies, respectively. Srijuntongsiri and Makhanov [9] proposed a numerical algorithm to reduce the kinematic errors for the existing industrial G-codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The fourth solution is given by (a − 2π, b) if a > 0 or (a + 2π, b) otherwise. Further details and a shortest path optimisation method with regard to the multiple solutions above are given in Makhanov and Munlin (2007), Munlin, Makhanov, and Bohez (2004). Similar multiple solutions can be derived for other five-axis configurations (Makhanov and Anotaipaiboon 2007).…”
Section: Kinematics Of the Five-axis Milling Machinementioning
confidence: 92%
“…In this paper, we use the following short-cut. It is well-known (Makhanov and Munlin 2007;Munlin, Makhanov, and Bohez 2004) that large variations of the rotation angles are the main cause of these errors. For instance, it is usually beneficial to generate a tool-path with a minimal number of turns (such as the zigzag) or even make the turns in the air.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The main objective is to anticipate the work piece geometrical quality as soon as the geometrical deviation of each component and the kinematical joints defects are known or identified. Detailed works have been done on the positioning errors and contact behaviour due to fixtures (Chaiprapat and Rujikietgumjorn 2008, Yeh and Liou 1999, Yeh and Liou 2000, Anotaipaiboon et al 2006. We consider that the part and the kinematic devices are rigid components, moreover the worst case that is maximum error of set-up error is considered.…”
Section: Product Manufactured Geometry Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%