2022
DOI: 10.1137/20m1375486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Signal-Adaptive Trading with Temporary and Transient Price Impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results in this paper significantly improve the results of [37] as we allow for a general Volterra propagator instead of an exponential one. This turns the stochastic control problem to become non-Markovian as the state variables (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results in this paper significantly improve the results of [37] as we allow for a general Volterra propagator instead of an exponential one. This turns the stochastic control problem to become non-Markovian as the state variables (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In this class of problems, sometimes temporary impact is also included, but trading signals are not taken into account, which leads to deterministic optimal strategies. In Neuman and Voß [37], the liquidation problem with an exponential propagator and a general semimartingale signal was solved and an explicit signal adaptive optimal strategy was derived.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As similarly show in Neuman and Voß (2022), a probabilistic and convex analytic calculus of variations approach can be readily applied to derive a system of coupled linear FBSDEs which characterises the unique solution to the minor agent's problem.…”
Section: Numerical Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We show how the Stackelberg equilibrium can be found by backward induction, that is by first solving the minor agent's problem and then the major agent's problem. We determine the minor agent's optimal strategy via a calculus of variations argument, as similarly done in Neuman and Voß (2022). The following results also borrow ideas from Casgrain and Jaimungal (2019).…”
Section: Numerical Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, our model nests various existing proposals in the literature, offering a unified discrete-time framework that we investigate in detail. Other related work on optimal order execution with (exponentially) decaying (linear) transient price impact in discrete and continuous time include, e.g., Alfonsi et al [5], Alfonsi and Schied [8], Predoiu et al [49], Alfonsi et al [9], Gatheral et al [31], Lorenz and Schied [45], Alfonsi and Schied [7], Alfonsi and Acevedo [3], Bank and Fruth [17], Alfonsi and Blanc [4], Fruth et al [28,29], Graewe and Horst [33], Lehalle and Neuman [43], Horst and Xia [37], Chen et al [24], Ackermann et al [1,2], Forde et al [27], Neuman and Voß [46]. Moreover, in the linear case, we also establish a new explicit formula, see Proposition 1, for the optimal execution strategy with stochastic transient price impact and inventory penalty, which extends the explicit deterministic solution from Obizhaeva and Wang [47] and allows us to also accurately benchmark our machine learning approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%