2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2912541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Social Insurance and Health Inequality

Abstract: This paper integrates into public economics a biologically founded, stochastic process of individual ageing. The novel approach enables us to investigate the interaction between health and retirement policy in order to quantitatively characterize the optimal joint design of the social insurance system today and in response to future medical progress, and its implications for health inequality. Calibrating our model to Germany, we find that currently the public health and pension system is approximately optimal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 73 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conceptually, our paper is also related to a strand of recent studies utilizing the health deficit approach to (re-)investigate the Preston curve (Dalgaard and Strulik, 2014), the historical evolution of retirement (Dalgaard and Strulik, 2013), the education gradient (Strulik, 2012), ageconsumption profiles (Strulik, 2015c), the role of adaptation for health behavior and health outcomes (Schünemann et al, 2015), and the optimal design of social welfare systems (Grossmann and Strulik, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conceptually, our paper is also related to a strand of recent studies utilizing the health deficit approach to (re-)investigate the Preston curve (Dalgaard and Strulik, 2014), the historical evolution of retirement (Dalgaard and Strulik, 2013), the education gradient (Strulik, 2012), ageconsumption profiles (Strulik, 2015c), the role of adaptation for health behavior and health outcomes (Schünemann et al, 2015), and the optimal design of social welfare systems (Grossmann and Strulik, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%