2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal spatial allocation of control effort to manage invasives in the face of imperfect detection and misclassification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, when uncertainty in subpopulation abundance was high, subpopulations may have received more or fewer resources than if abundance had been observed more accurately. This allocation error resulted in decreased and more uncertain ROI, similar to Bonneau et al (2019) and Regan et al (2011) and occurred regardless of the true connectivity structure. Uncertainty in connectivity did not explain as much of the variation in ROI for different resource allocation strategies as compared to uncertainty in abundance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, when uncertainty in subpopulation abundance was high, subpopulations may have received more or fewer resources than if abundance had been observed more accurately. This allocation error resulted in decreased and more uncertain ROI, similar to Bonneau et al (2019) and Regan et al (2011) and occurred regardless of the true connectivity structure. Uncertainty in connectivity did not explain as much of the variation in ROI for different resource allocation strategies as compared to uncertainty in abundance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…In addition to structural uncertainty in the ecological and management processes that determine the true levels of abundance, the data used by managers to implement connectivity‐based management are uncertain due to observational error. Observational uncertainty in monitoring data of invader presence or abundance can make theoretically optimal strategies less effective (Chades et al 2011, Regan et al 2011, Rout et al 2014, Kling et al 2017, Bonneau et al 2019). Similarly, as the optimal resource allocation strategy depends on the relationship between invader abundance and damage costs (Yokomizo et al 2009, Davis et al 2018a), imperfect knowledge in this relationship could affect the optimal strategy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every country introduced with Cichla spp. were developing taskforce to control its widespread in affected water bodies but, their actions were delivered to the entire area rather than isolating the target from the non-target species ( Epanchin-Niell and Wilen, 2012 ; Büyüktahtakın and Haight, 2018 ; Bonneau et al., 2019 ). In fact, several decisions that favoured revenue over existing biodiversity ( Meiners-Mandujano et al., 2019 ; Ramírez-Albores et al., 2019 ), were challenged by priorities ( Pelicice et al., 2014 ; Ota et al., 2019 ), work ethics, hiring schemes, conflicting interests ( Fischer et al., 2014 ; Humair et al., 2014 ; Pietrzyk-Kaszyńska and Grodzińska-Jurczak, 2015 ) divided tradition and total neglect on local knowledge ( Fischer et al., 2014 ; Humair et al., 2014 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corresponding Editor: Trenton W. J. Garner. Wilen 2012, Guillera-Arroita et al 2014, Jafari et al 2018, Bonneau et al 2019. This optimization is aimed at determining the allocation of management effort (costs, number of installed traps, labor, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization of spatial resource allocation is a powerful tool for decision‐making in control programs for invasive species (Hauser and McCarthy 2009, Chadès et al 2011, Giljohann et al 2011, Epanchin‐Niell and Wilen 2012, Guillera‐Arroita et al 2014, Jafari et al 2018, Bonneau et al 2019). This optimization is aimed at determining the allocation of management effort (costs, number of installed traps, labor, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%