2008
DOI: 10.1137/060673916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Stopping Games for Markov Processes

Abstract: , Probab. Statist. Group Manchester (21 pp) Let X = (X t ) t≥0 be a strong Markov process, and let G 1 , G 2 and G 3 be continuous functions satisfying G 1 ≤ G 3 ≤ G 2 and E x sup t |G i (X t )| < ∞ for i = 1, 2, 3 . Consider the optimal stopping game where the sup-player chooses a stopping time τ to maximise, and the inf-player chooses a stopping time σ to minimise, the expected payoffwhere X 0 = x under P x . Define the upper value and the lower value of the game bywhere the horizon T (the upper bound for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
84
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was recently proved in [12] that if X is right-continuous, then the Stackelberg equilibrium (1.3) holds with V := V* -V* defining a measur able function, and if X is right-continuous and left-continuous over stopping times, then the Nash equilibrium (1.4) holds with r. -inf {t > 0: X t e A} and a, = inf {t > 0: X t e D 2 ), (1.5) where Di -{V -d} and D 2 = {V = G 2 }. The two sufficient conditions are known to be most general in optimal stopping theory (see, e.g., [27] and [28]).…”
Section: U X {Ra) = E X [G I (X T )I(tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was recently proved in [12] that if X is right-continuous, then the Stackelberg equilibrium (1.3) holds with V := V* -V* defining a measur able function, and if X is right-continuous and left-continuous over stopping times, then the Nash equilibrium (1.4) holds with r. -inf {t > 0: X t e A} and a, = inf {t > 0: X t e D 2 ), (1.5) where Di -{V -d} and D 2 = {V = G 2 }. The two sufficient conditions are known to be most general in optimal stopping theory (see, e.g., [27] and [28]).…”
Section: U X {Ra) = E X [G I (X T )I(tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, if X is only right-continuous and not left-continuous over stopping times, then the Nash equilibrium can break down while the Stackelberg equilibrium still holds (cf. [12,Example 3.1]). …”
Section: U X {Ra) = E X [G I (X T )I(tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These games have later found applications for example in mathematical finance, see [13], which motivated further studies, see for example [1], [5], [6], [7], [14] and [19]. Other more recent contributions study various modifications of the zero-sum optimal stopping game.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A game with continuous time where players have possibility to stop more than once was presented in Laraki and Solan (2005). An extensive bibliography on games can be found in Ekström and Peskir (2008), Nowak and Szajowski (1999), , Ramsey and Szajowski (2008) and Solan and Vieille (2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%