2008
DOI: 10.1080/00207540802273827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal supply planning in MRP environments for assembly systems with random component procurement times

Abstract: This paper examines supply planning in an MRP environment for assembly systems under lead time uncertainties. Indeed, inventory control in a supply chain is crucial for companies who wish to satisfy their customer demands on time as well as controlling costs. A common approach is to use the MRP techniques. However, these techniques are based on the supposition that lead times are known. In an actual supply chain the lead times are often random variables. Therefore, we develop an efficient exact model to aid in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, serious weaknesses in the approach were that it is only valid if all component procurement lead times follow the same probability distribution and if all components have the same unit inventory holding cost. The optimization approach was generalized in [3] to consider procurement lead times that are independent, but not necessarily identically distributed in order to minimize the expected total cost. In continuation of this work, various approaches [36,[39][40][41][42] have attempted to extend this model to study other replenishment policies (L4L, POQ, EOQ, etc.)…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, serious weaknesses in the approach were that it is only valid if all component procurement lead times follow the same probability distribution and if all components have the same unit inventory holding cost. The optimization approach was generalized in [3] to consider procurement lead times that are independent, but not necessarily identically distributed in order to minimize the expected total cost. In continuation of this work, various approaches [36,[39][40][41][42] have attempted to extend this model to study other replenishment policies (L4L, POQ, EOQ, etc.)…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we extend the model proposed in [3] in order to investigate an OLAS under lead-time uncertainty and to examine the benefit of paying suppliers an additional purchase cost (APC) in order to reduce the costs of component lead-time uncertainty. In [3], a one-level assembly system was considered with several suppliers and random supplier lead times. The authors optimized planned lead-times for a fixed set of selected suppliers, taking into account the statistics on the real lead times.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For further reading on application of classic control theory to logistics and supply chain management, we refer to the study by Ortega and Lin (2004). Louly, Dolgui, and Hnaien (2008) addressed uncertainty in lead time and developed an approach to optimal supply planning in MRP environments for assembly systems with random component procurement times. Scholz-Reiter et al (2010) use stability analysis with regard to autonomously controlled production networks.…”
Section: Editorial Supply Chain Dynamics Control and Disruption Manamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the premise of a completely deterministic scenario does not match the reality of a manufacturing environment. The literature reports different approaches to consider uncertainty in MRP systems, such as simulation [11], [12], stochastic inventory control [13], fuzzy logic [14], fuzzy mathematical programming [15][16][17][18], fuzzy programming with resources based on the credibility theory [19] and MRP parameterization [20][21][22], among others. Other approaches to consider uncertainty in MRP systems can be found in several reviews [23][24][25].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%