2016
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.22567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal synthesis of a heat‐integrated petroleum refinery configuration

Abstract: The conceptual design of a petroleum refinery that satisfies multiple economics and operating constraints is a highly complex task. Coupled with the ever rising cost in designing and constructing a new refinery and the increasing demand for energy and fuels, there is incentive in optimizing the energy recovery and energy efficiency of such a facility. This work addresses the flowsheet optimization of the synthesis of a petroleum refinery to attain an optimal heat-integrated configuration or topology. A sequent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of the research was completed in the lab, with some verification performed at the small pilot plant. The subject of analyses include the study on profit enhancement 20,21) , operational expenditure (OPEX) saving 17,[22][23][24] , production rate improvement 25) , key product yield maximization 19) , power consumption optimization 26,27) , utility saving 25) , exergy destruction minimization 28,29) , ethylene leakage reduction 27) , hydrogen recovery improvement 27) , CO2 emissions minimization 26) , Coil Outlet Temperature (COT) enhancement 18,30,31) , and multiple optimization initiatives 19,25,26,28,29,32,33) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the research was completed in the lab, with some verification performed at the small pilot plant. The subject of analyses include the study on profit enhancement 20,21) , operational expenditure (OPEX) saving 17,[22][23][24] , production rate improvement 25) , key product yield maximization 19) , power consumption optimization 26,27) , utility saving 25) , exergy destruction minimization 28,29) , ethylene leakage reduction 27) , hydrogen recovery improvement 27) , CO2 emissions minimization 26) , Coil Outlet Temperature (COT) enhancement 18,30,31) , and multiple optimization initiatives 19,25,26,28,29,32,33) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%