1979
DOI: 10.1109/tcs.1979.1084623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal synthesis of second-order state-space structures for digital filters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
3

Year Published

1984
1984
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
45
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The noise gain of the second-order state-space structure of [3] is approximately a constant function of the pole angle, having the value 17 dB when and 8 dB when It is concluded that when the pole angle is small, the transposed DFII delta realization outperforms the nine-coefficient statespace structure with respect to output roundoff noise.…”
Section: Comparison Of Structuresmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The noise gain of the second-order state-space structure of [3] is approximately a constant function of the pole angle, having the value 17 dB when and 8 dB when It is concluded that when the pole angle is small, the transposed DFII delta realization outperforms the nine-coefficient statespace structure with respect to output roundoff noise.…”
Section: Comparison Of Structuresmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…State-space structures which minimize the output roundoff noise were studied in [1]- [3], and coefficient sensitivity minimizing networks were analyzed in [4] and [5]. An efficient method to reduce the effects due to signal quantizations is the concept of error feedback, sometimes called residue feedback, error spectrum shaping, or noise shaping [6]- [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This condition, together with , is sufficient for (unscaled) optimality [3]. Note that the state matrix is equal to , so equality of its diagonal entries is met.…”
Section: Optimal Form Structurementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The elements on its principal diagonal are the power gains from the input to the states, and should be unity for a correctly scaled section. The scaled noise gain is then (3) where its makes no difference for the result if we calculate from the matrices and of the unscaled structure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, by carefully choosing the final realization, it is possible to minimize the impact of finite word-length on the performance of the system. For example, structures particularly suitable to operate with poles close to the unit circle can be found in [13], [14], optimal state-space realizations of second-order filters having minimum roundoff noise are described in [15], [16], and procedures to get low sensitivity are presented in [17], etc. It is also possible to apply techniques based on genetic algorithms, to obtain robust second-order structures under finite word-length conditions [18], [19].…”
Section: Implementation Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%