2011
DOI: 10.1159/000328026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Techniques for mRNA Extraction from Neonatal Salivary Supernatant

Abstract: gene expression differences between these biolayers. Results: mRNA was successfully extracted and amplified from all salivary supernatant samples. Extraction with method 2 yielded more RNA than with method 1 (p = 0.008). There was a 7.5% discordance between paired gene expression analyses for whole saliva and supernatant. Genes that were statistically significantly upregulated in supernatant highlighted 16 distinct biological functions not seen in whole saliva. Conversely, only two biological functions were un… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Pandit and colleagues (2013) have modified an existing Qiagen protocol (QIAzol), to provide investigators with a robust, cost-effective alternative to other commercially available RNA extraction kits. By comparison, published reports in the newborn have successfully used Qiagen's RNAProtect Saliva Solution on multiple downstream transcriptomic platforms (Maron et al , 2012bDietz et al 2012). Thus, investigators have options when considering salivary collection and extraction kits and should consider study design, location and costs when choosing a product or protocol.…”
Section: Salivary Collection Storage and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…More recently, Pandit and colleagues (2013) have modified an existing Qiagen protocol (QIAzol), to provide investigators with a robust, cost-effective alternative to other commercially available RNA extraction kits. By comparison, published reports in the newborn have successfully used Qiagen's RNAProtect Saliva Solution on multiple downstream transcriptomic platforms (Maron et al , 2012bDietz et al 2012). Thus, investigators have options when considering salivary collection and extraction kits and should consider study design, location and costs when choosing a product or protocol.…”
Section: Salivary Collection Storage and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saliva is collected in the syringe for 20 -30 sec and immediately stabilized at the bedside. Samples may then be left at room temperature, 4˚C or frozen at -20˚C or -80˚C pending processing and manufacturer's guidelines (Dietz et al 2012). Most commercially available collection kits allow for samples to sit at room temperature for days to weeks without any risk of RNA degradation.…”
Section: Salivary Collection Storage and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neonatal studies conducted by Deitz et al [35] compared gene expression differences between whole saliva with cell-free salivary supernatant through microarray and RT-qPCR analysis. Total cfRNA was successfully extracted from all neonatal salivary supernatant samples, even from volumes as low as 10 μl (range 10-100 μl).…”
Section: Saliva Cfrnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All samples were run on a 7900 model sequence detector with TaqMan One-Step RT-PCR Master Mix reagents kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) as previously described [22].…”
Section: Fetal Nucleic Acid Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 99%