2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2009.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal therapeutic protocols in cancer immunotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The equilibrium point in this case is unstable because the value of 1 s is smaller than critical value (540), but optimal solution of equations pushes the system to the area with smaller cancerous cells. In this work in comparison with the works done in [16][17][18] (see Figures 3 and 4).…”
Section: Results Of the Immunotherapy Modelmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The equilibrium point in this case is unstable because the value of 1 s is smaller than critical value (540), but optimal solution of equations pushes the system to the area with smaller cancerous cells. In this work in comparison with the works done in [16][17][18] (see Figures 3 and 4).…”
Section: Results Of the Immunotherapy Modelmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…(1) To lessen the treatment burden of patients. This method considers some constraints on the treatment policy [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have investigated the effects of therapeutic inputs, which are considered to have direct effects on the system states [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. However, the behavior of cancer changes as the disease progresses [44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A down-side to the model was that at the end of treatment, tumor mass tended to start regrowth. Ghafferi and Naserifar [31] improved upon the model of Burden at al. [7] by including a linear penalty, −ωy(t f ), where ω is constant, y is the quantity of cancer cells and t f is the final time-point of observation, such that their objective functional is J G (u) = −ωy(t f ) + J B (u) (note that −ωy(t f ) is the terminal payoff for J G (u), as defined above).…”
Section: Optimal Control Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%