2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Threshold Determination for Interpreting Semantic Similarity and Particularity: Application to the Comparison of Gene Sets and Metabolic Pathways Using GO and ChEBI

Abstract: BackgroundThe analysis of gene annotations referencing back to Gene Ontology plays an important role in the interpretation of high-throughput experiments results. This analysis typically involves semantic similarity and particularity measures that quantify the importance of the Gene Ontology annotations. However, there is currently no sound method supporting the interpretation of the similarity and particularity values in order to determine whether two genes are similar or whether one gene has some significant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GO‐BP enrichment was further analyzed to exclude redundant and similar GO‐BP terms. To this goal, we computed the semantic similarity between each GO‐BP term resulting in the enrichment using Python package GOATOOLS 42 and filtered for redundant GO‐BPs following the reported similarity threshold process 43 . Results were finally compared across the different type of statins to identify specific and common pathways and mechanisms of action.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GO‐BP enrichment was further analyzed to exclude redundant and similar GO‐BP terms. To this goal, we computed the semantic similarity between each GO‐BP term resulting in the enrichment using Python package GOATOOLS 42 and filtered for redundant GO‐BPs following the reported similarity threshold process 43 . Results were finally compared across the different type of statins to identify specific and common pathways and mechanisms of action.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genes deemed to be biologically related to a SMA-selected marker were those with a semantic similarity above 0.4 for any of the GO terms about the gene(s) associated with the SMA-selected marker (whenever available). The semantic similarity was the metric of Wang et al (2007) described above and a threshold of 0.4 was set as recommended by Bettembourg et al (2015). For each SMA-selected marker, preselected pairs were those involving the selected marker and the markers associated with its biologically related genes.…”
Section: Additive × Additive Marker Effects: Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the scores are normalised between 0 and 1 and represent the probability of two sets of MeSH terms to be similar. For this reason, a value of 0.5 (50% probability) is often used as minimum threshold to select the statistically significant comparisons 24 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%