2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.08.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal timing for surgical revascularization in survivors of acute coronary syndromes eligible for elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The PL-ACS registry included 2028 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), in which 55% had UA and indication for CABG, 60% underwent surgery at different time intervals. They concluded that after 12 months of waiting for CABG the risk of death rises in twice and CABG performed during the first month after ACS is associated with increased prevalence of mortality, considering the ideal interval to wait between 1-3 months [22]. This result is different compared to the found in this study, in which the average waiting time was 11.7 days; unrelated to increased mortality, probably due to not including patients with acute transmural myocardial infarction.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The PL-ACS registry included 2028 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), in which 55% had UA and indication for CABG, 60% underwent surgery at different time intervals. They concluded that after 12 months of waiting for CABG the risk of death rises in twice and CABG performed during the first month after ACS is associated with increased prevalence of mortality, considering the ideal interval to wait between 1-3 months [22]. This result is different compared to the found in this study, in which the average waiting time was 11.7 days; unrelated to increased mortality, probably due to not including patients with acute transmural myocardial infarction.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…There are no clear recommendations on which the ideal timeout for conducting CABG after UA. The advantages of early CABG for the treatment of UA include limiting the area of ischemia and left ventricular remodeling, however, it can lead to reperfusion injury and further damage to the myocardium, thereby increasing the systemic inflammatory response [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Registries give a unique opportunity to investigate, in a reliable manner, therapeutic interventions, and outcomes in authentic clinical situations [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with clinical practice because, on the basis of retrospective registries, many patients were operated on a relatively long time after the acute phase of NSTE-ACS. Zembala et al [26] showed that only 60% of patients initially referred for cardiac surgery underwent CABG, of which more than two-thirds were operated on in the first three months after ACS. In other studies, the implementation of deferred CABG was associated with comparable [27,28] or even more favourable short-term results [29] than early CABG.…”
Section: Timing Of Revascularisationmentioning
confidence: 99%