2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal timing of interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A retrospective study from the ESME national cohort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary objective of 15 studies was the investigation of PFS and OS with respect to the number of NACT cycles [ 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ], while in the remaining studies this result was reported but not as the primary outcome [ 28 29 30 31 32 33 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The primary objective of 15 studies was the investigation of PFS and OS with respect to the number of NACT cycles [ 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ], while in the remaining studies this result was reported but not as the primary outcome [ 28 29 30 31 32 33 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding survival outcomes, 16 studies [ 13 16 17 18 19 21 22 23 26 27 28 29 30 32 33 35 ] showed no significant differences in PFS and OS when comparing patients undergoing delayed or early IDS. In 6 studies [ 14 15 20 24 25 31 ], an unfavorable outcome was linked to an increase in the number of NACT cycles prior to IDS. Interestingly, Stoeckle et al [ 30 ] discovered a trend towards improved survival in patients undergoing delayed IDS (≥5 cycles of NACT), although the results were not statistically significant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a way to assess the optimal timing of ICS, we recently performed a retrospective study attempting to limit the bias of confounding factors influencing the selection of patients for a standard ICS (i.e., 3-4 NACT cycles) or delayed ICS (i.e., ≥5 NACT cycles) using two propensity score statistical methods (the inverse probability of treatment weights, or IPTW method, and the propensity score matching method) on a large French national cohort (the epidemiological strategy and medical economics, or ESME) of 928 aEOC patients [59]. The ESME research program is based on data collected from expert French Comprehensive Cancer Centers, with the aim of providing independent and high-quality RWD collected from electronic health records.…”
Section: Apart From Primary Versus Interval Surgeries: How Many Nact ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It offers a large real-world multicenter cohort, with demographics, tumor characteristics, clinical features, clinical events, and treatment-related data that may lead to a better knowledge of ovarian cancer disease history. Based on the ESME ovarian cancer platform, two studies that assessed the specificities of endometrioid ovarian cancers and the optimal timing of debulking surgery have been published recently [ 31 , 32 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%