2021
DOI: 10.4230/lipics.icalp.2021.123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Transformations of Games and Automata Using Muller Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One may wonder why we seek to define a parity condition on top of M to prove that W is ω-regular, rather than a more general Muller condition which would achieve the same goal. Indeed, using M-cycle-consistency and a recent result by Casares et al [11,Section 5], it is straightforward to show that we could relabel such a Muller automaton with a parity condition defining the same language.…”
Section: From Properties Of a Winning Condition To ω-Regularitymentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One may wonder why we seek to define a parity condition on top of M to prove that W is ω-regular, rather than a more general Muller condition which would achieve the same goal. Indeed, using M-cycle-consistency and a recent result by Casares et al [11,Section 5], it is straightforward to show that we could relabel such a Muller automaton with a parity condition defining the same language.…”
Section: From Properties Of a Winning Condition To ω-Regularitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…, n}; function p assigns priorities to every transition of M. This definition implies that we consider deterministic and complete parity automata (i.e., in every state, reading a color leads to exactly one state). Following [11], if M is a skeleton, we say that a parity automaton (M ′ , p) is defined on top of…”
Section: W Is Chromatic-finite-memory Determinedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is sufficient to know which of the prohibited and required sets are visited infinitely often. 5 Hence, index appearance record uses the indices of the Rabin pairs instead of particular states in the permutation construction. This provides enough information to decide acceptance.…”
Section: Index Appearance Recordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and at least 2k priorities indeed is necessary [26, Theorem 2]. There, a much more generic result is proven, yielding lower bounds for translations from any particular acceptance condition α to parity automata via the notion of Zielonka trees (see [5] for a similar result on Muller conditions). Instantiating the theorem for Rabin condition, observe that the Zielonka tree associated with Rabin has k!…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation