2021
DOI: 10.3390/electronics10091109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Tuning of Fractional Order Controllers for Dual Active Bridge-Based DC Microgrid Including Voltage Stability Assessment

Abstract: In this article, three evolutionary search algorithms: particle swarm optimization (PSO), simulated annealing (SA) and genetic algorithms (GA), have been employed to determine the optimal parameter values of the fractional-order (FO)-PI controllers implemented in the dual active bridge-based (DAB) DC microgrid. The optimum strategy to obtain the parameters of these FO-PI controllers is still a major challenge for many power systems applications. The FO-PI controllers implemented in the DAB are used to control … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending upon selection of parameter values from (λ-μ) plane (7) can behave as P, PI, and PD controller. (λ-μ) plane is represented in figure 6 [15].…”
Section: Anfis Based Fopid Active Damping Modified Controller (Anfis ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Depending upon selection of parameter values from (λ-μ) plane (7) can behave as P, PI, and PD controller. (λ-μ) plane is represented in figure 6 [15].…”
Section: Anfis Based Fopid Active Damping Modified Controller (Anfis ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the FOPID represents an extended and more generalized form of the PID, incorporating fractional derivative-integral calculus. This controller is suitable for non-linear systems, enhances the robustness and flexibility of the system, and offers several advantages like reduced oscillation, and overshoot, improved response time, and insensitivity to disturbing effects [15]. The problem with this controller is that it has five parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each individual is represented as a chromosome, and the chromosome is composed of genes. Genes can be meaningful numerical values, symbols, or binary codes [21]. Figure 7 shows the flowchart of GA, while Algorithm 1 presents the pseudocode of GA, and its basic steps include the following.…”
Section: Genetic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Opting for other heuristic algorithms might require more practice and case validation to ascertain their performance and applicability [20]. Azab and Serrano-Fontova [21] further elaborate that in microgrid controllers, the most stable performance occurs when parameters are adjusted using GA, while the use of PSO for parameter tuning tends to yield less stability. GA achieves the best dynamic response, whereas PSO results in the least dynamic response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strategy proposed in this paper can effectively accelerate the bus stability time and reduce its fluctuation, but the selection of energy storage unit is still based on the battery energy storage. Reference [11] proposed the use of three evolutionary search algorithms, particle swarm optimization (PSO), simulated annealing (SA) and genetic algorithms (GA), to determine the optimal parameter values of the fractional-order (FO)-PI controllers implemented in dual-active bridge-based (DAB) DC microgrids. The aim of this was to find the optimal parameters for these controllers in terms of voltage stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%