2019
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.99.052346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal verification and fidelity estimation of maximally entangled states

Abstract: We study the verification of maximally entangled states by virtue of the simplest measurement settings: local projective measurements without adaption. We show that optimal protocols are in one-to-one correspondence with complex projective 2-designs constructed from orthonormal bases. Optimal protocols with minimal measurement settings are in one-to-one correspondence with complete sets of mutually unbiased bases. Based on this observation, optimal protocols are constructed explicitly for any local dimension, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
110
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By "trivial test" we mean the test projector is equal to the identity operator. For bipartite pure states [40,41,43,44] and stabilizer states [42], the homogeneous strategy can also be realized by virtue of local projective measurements when λ is sufficiently large. In the nonadversarial scenario, a smaller λ achieves a better performance among homogeneous strategies.…”
Section: Homogeneous Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By "trivial test" we mean the test projector is equal to the identity operator. For bipartite pure states [40,41,43,44] and stabilizer states [42], the homogeneous strategy can also be realized by virtue of local projective measurements when λ is sufficiently large. In the nonadversarial scenario, a smaller λ achieves a better performance among homogeneous strategies.…”
Section: Homogeneous Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, entangling measurements are less helpful and often unnecessary for constructing the optimal strategies in the case of bipartite and multipartite systems. In the case of bipartite pure states for example, the optimal strategies for high-precision verification can be realized by virtue of local projective measurements [40,41,43,44] (cf. Sec.…”
Section: Number Of Required Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a powerful approach known as quantum state verification [5][6][7] has attracted increasing attention. This approach has led to efficient protocols for verifying bipartite pure states [5,6,[8][9][10][11], stabilizer states (including graph states) [7,[12][13][14][15], hypergraph states [16], weighted graph states [17], and Dicke states [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, we have Θ P ≤ Θ ≤ 1, and the maximally entangled state |Φ is an eigenstate of Θ P and Θ with the largest eigenvalue 1. Formally Θ P , Θ are verification operators of |Φ [22], so many results presented in Ref. [22] can be applied to the current study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formally Θ P , Θ are verification operators of |Φ [22], so many results presented in Ref. [22] can be applied to the current study. A simple way for constructing balanced ensembles is to use orthonormal bases: If {|ψ j } j forms an orthonormal basis in H, then the ensemble {|ψ j ψ j |, p j = 1/d} j is balanced.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%