Heuristics 2011
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199744282.003.0034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient Is the 1/N Portfolio Strategy?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

66
1,124
7
25

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 692 publications
(1,222 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
66
1,124
7
25
Order By: Relevance
“…As DeMiguel et al, (2009) show, over a sample of seven datasets, the simple 1/N rule outperforms the Markov Portfolio strategy in fourteen alternative portfolio specifications. "Rational" allocation strategies yield very high estimation errors in the variance-covariance matrices.…”
Section: Routines Rules Of Thumb Heuristicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As DeMiguel et al, (2009) show, over a sample of seven datasets, the simple 1/N rule outperforms the Markov Portfolio strategy in fourteen alternative portfolio specifications. "Rational" allocation strategies yield very high estimation errors in the variance-covariance matrices.…”
Section: Routines Rules Of Thumb Heuristicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although DeMiguel et al (2009) The central intuition for our findings is based on the tradeoff between the exploitation of mispricing and sampling variation in estimated parameters when comparing mean-variance strategies against the 1/N rule. In the absence of mispricing, estimation errors cause the mean-variance strategies to under-perform the 1/N rule.…”
Section: Plans Indicate That Participants Tend To Allocate Their Contmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In this case, the 1/N rule is likely to outperform sample-based mean-variance strategies, which are plagued by estimation errors. Our analytical expression provides an explanation for the excellent performance of the 1/N rule in DeMiguel et al (2009) without resorting to simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations