2013
DOI: 10.1002/asjc.719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Vibration Control for Vehicle Active Suspension Discrete‐Time Systems with Actuator Time Delay

Abstract: This study researches the vibration control approach for vehicle active suspension discrete-time systems with actuator time delay under road disturbances. First, the discrete-time models for the quarter vehicle active suspension system with actuator time delay are presented, and road disturbances are considered as the output of an exosystem. By introducing a discrete variable transformation, the discrete-time system with actuator time delay and the quadratic performance index are transformed into equivalent on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assume that the system is controlled by the following control law: ufalse(tfalse)=Kxfalse(tfalse), where K =[2.81 −363.43 −162.48 −9.17] is the state feedback gain matrix and the actuator time‐delay satisfies 0.1 ≤ τ ( t ) ≤ 0.2. The detailed description of designing the state feedback control law for a quarter‐car suspension system with actuator time‐delay can be found in other works . By using the zero‐order hold method with the sampling period T s , the discrete‐time state‐space model of the closed‐loop system can be described in the form of with the following parameters: alignleftalign-1align-2A=0.41601em0.99231em0.06221em0.00970.44540.15141em0.02760.00532.31463.85021em0.76531em0.03823.21221em4.73871em0.40830.5138,Ad=00.0050.00220.000101em0.00381em0.00171em0.00010.00020.01970.00880.00050.00020.02730.01220.0007align-1align-2B=…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assume that the system is controlled by the following control law: ufalse(tfalse)=Kxfalse(tfalse), where K =[2.81 −363.43 −162.48 −9.17] is the state feedback gain matrix and the actuator time‐delay satisfies 0.1 ≤ τ ( t ) ≤ 0.2. The detailed description of designing the state feedback control law for a quarter‐car suspension system with actuator time‐delay can be found in other works . By using the zero‐order hold method with the sampling period T s , the discrete‐time state‐space model of the closed‐loop system can be described in the form of with the following parameters: alignleftalign-1align-2A=0.41601em0.99231em0.06221em0.00970.44540.15141em0.02760.00532.31463.85021em0.76531em0.03823.21221em4.73871em0.40830.5138,Ad=00.0050.00220.000101em0.00381em0.00171em0.00010.00020.01970.00880.00050.00020.02730.01220.0007align-1align-2B=…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated in , the following finite sum of fourier series describes the road displacement input zr(t)=falsefalsej=1pξj(t)=falsefalsej=1pφjsin(jω0t+θj), where φj=2Gd(jnormalΔnormalΩ)normalΔnormalΩ, ΔΩ = 2 π / l , the initial phase θ j ∈[0,2 π ) is a random variable, p(]array(ω2ω1)/ω0+1,array(ω2ω1)/ω0+2is used to restrict the range of frequency with [ω1,3.0235ptω2]=[]β1ks/ms,3.0235ptβ2ks/ms, where 0 < β 1 < 1 < β 2 , ωn=ks/ms, and l is the length of road segment.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Han et al . apply optimal techniques to the problem of active vehicle suspensions in the presence of actuator time delays. Zhan et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%