2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2016.01.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimality and flexibility in Iterative Learning Control for varying tasks

Abstract: DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To enhance the robustness to varying tasks, ILC approaches have been extended with basis functions in, e.g., [42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. However, since these approaches are developed in the norm-based optimization framework, the large burden imposed on the modeling requirements may prevent industrial implementation (R2).…”
Section: Ilc For Varying Tasks (R3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To enhance the robustness to varying tasks, ILC approaches have been extended with basis functions in, e.g., [42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. However, since these approaches are developed in the norm-based optimization framework, the large burden imposed on the modeling requirements may prevent industrial implementation (R2).…”
Section: Ilc For Varying Tasks (R3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively to the linear combination of basis functions utilized here, also rational (nonlinear) combinations of basis functions can be employed, see, e.g., [42,47,13,75]. Although these parametrizations potentially enable performance improvements, the associated optimization problem becomes non-convex, and often nonlinear algorithms are required for which, in general, convergence to the global minimum cannot be guaranteed.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iterative learning control (ILC) is a useful control strategy to make systems operate in repetitive tasks and increase control precision by learning from the previous control experience. [21][22][23][24][25][26] Since ILC can achieve expected output trajectory tracking in a limited operation time and can be employed with no need to know perfect information of the target system, it is widely applied to robotic manipulators. In the work of Tayebi, 27 an adaptive ILC method is developed for rigid robot manipulators to realize trajectory tracking with unknown parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For repetitive systems, iterative learning control (ILC) [12][13][14][15] is an effective control method. The algorithm does not rely on the accurate mathematical model of the dynamic system, and it can achieve expected output trajectory tracking in limited time and interval with little prior knowledge and computational effort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%