2022
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.106.032219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimality of any pair of incompatible rank-one projective measurements for some nontrivial Bell inequality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two proposals in this direction have succeeded in designing different classes of Bell inequalities tailored to the broad family of multi-qubit graph states [17,18] and the first Bell inequalities maximally violated by the maximally entangled state of any local dimension [19]. The success of these methods was further confirmed by later applications to design the first self-testing Bell inequalities for graph states [20] (see also [21] for the first self-testing method for multi-qubit graph states which, however, is not directly based on violation of Bell inequalities), for genuinely entangled stabilizer subspaces [22,23] or maximally entangled two-qutrit states [24], as well as to derive many other classes of Bell inequalities tailored to two-qudit maximally entangled [25,26] or many-qudit Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) states [27]. Some of these constructions were later exploited to provide self-testing schemes for the maximally entangled [25,28] or the GHZ states [29] of arbitrary local dimension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two proposals in this direction have succeeded in designing different classes of Bell inequalities tailored to the broad family of multi-qubit graph states [17,18] and the first Bell inequalities maximally violated by the maximally entangled state of any local dimension [19]. The success of these methods was further confirmed by later applications to design the first self-testing Bell inequalities for graph states [20] (see also [21] for the first self-testing method for multi-qubit graph states which, however, is not directly based on violation of Bell inequalities), for genuinely entangled stabilizer subspaces [22,23] or maximally entangled two-qutrit states [24], as well as to derive many other classes of Bell inequalities tailored to two-qudit maximally entangled [25,26] or many-qudit Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) states [27]. Some of these constructions were later exploited to provide self-testing schemes for the maximally entangled [25,28] or the GHZ states [29] of arbitrary local dimension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is worth stressing here that one of the key observations making the construction of [20] work is that for any graph there exists a choice of observables at any site, given by the above formulas, turning the quantum operators appearing in the expectation values of ( 27) into the stabilising operators G i ; in particular, it is a well-known fact that combinations of the Pauli matrices in equation ( 28) are proper quantum observables with eigenvalues ±1. Let us also mention that the replacement in equations ( 25) and (26) guarantees that the maximal quantum and classical values of the inequalities ( 27) can be determined basically by hand and that they differ for any graph state, implying that all these inequalities are nontrivial.…”
Section: Multiqubit Graph Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%