1975
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.21.11.1303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimality of Myopic Inventory Policies for Certain Dependent Demand Processes

Abstract: This paper shows that the optimal policy for single-product periodic ordering systems with proportional holding and stockout costs and zero lead time is myopic for both stationary and nonstationary demand processes as described by Box and Jenkins. The proof of optimality is based on a theorem by Veinott showing that the myopic policy is optimal in each period if the beginning inventory for that period is less than the critical number which is the optimal policy for that period considered in isolation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Johnson and Thompson (1975) are among the first to study correlated demand in a single item and a single location setting. Erkip et al (1990) consider a multi-echelon inventory system where demand is a first-order autoregressive process and is correlated across sites and time.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Johnson and Thompson (1975) are among the first to study correlated demand in a single item and a single location setting. Erkip et al (1990) consider a multi-echelon inventory system where demand is a first-order autoregressive process and is correlated across sites and time.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the reasons mentioned above, some authors have studied inventory models with time-correlated demand, including AR models (Aviv, 2002;Reyman, 1989;Johnson and Thompson, 1975), compound Poisson processes (Shang and Song, 2003), martingale models of forecast evolution (Dong and Lee, 2003;Lu et al, 2006;Wang et al, 2012), factor models (See and Sim, 2010) or estimation via Kalman filter (Aviv, 2003). Most of these papers either assume perfect knowledge of the distribution function (Levi et al, 2008;Aviv, 2003Aviv, , 2002Shang and Song, 2003;Wang et al, 2012;Reyman, 1989) or are focused in calculating and optimizing bounds of the objective function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karaesmen et al (1999) developed a dynamic programming formulation of a discretized, Markovian version of the Buzacott-Shanthikumar model with unit demand and productions in each period, and showed computationally that the value of advance information decreases with system utilization. There is also a stream of literature that ignores the capacitated nature of the production environment and uses alternative models to incorporate forecasts of stationary demand in inventory management decisions (e.g., Veinott 1965, Johnson and Thompson 1975, Miller 1986, Badinelli 1990, Lovejoy 1992, Drezner et al 1996, Chen et al 1997, Aviv 1998). To our knowledge, this paper contains the first analysis of a capacitated production-inventory model facing a general stationary stochastic demand process and dynamic forecast updates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%