2014
DOI: 10.1111/lnc3.12065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimality Theory and Spanish Phonology

Abstract: This article surveys research in Spanish phonology from the perspective of Optimality Theory, a formal linguistic framework based on ranked and violable constraints. Theoretical insights from OT enrich our understanding of Spanish phonology, and Spanish data also figure prominently in the latest theoretical developments within OT. The article concludes with areas for ongoing research and suggestions for further reading on OT in Spanish phonology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of (a), negligible coarticulation is attested when C offset and V onset are aligned (Bradley 2014) (furthermore, if scenario (a) were instead between consecutive consonants, it is precisely the configuration necessary for intrusive vowels given the sizeable gap between gestures (Gafos 2002, Hall 2006). Scenario (b) overlaps vocalic with consonantal articulations one landmark to the left, aligning C release (instead of offset) and V onset, the result of which is a derived secondary articulation on C (Bateman 2007).…”
Section: Articulatory Phonology-based Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of (a), negligible coarticulation is attested when C offset and V onset are aligned (Bradley 2014) (furthermore, if scenario (a) were instead between consecutive consonants, it is precisely the configuration necessary for intrusive vowels given the sizeable gap between gestures (Gafos 2002, Hall 2006). Scenario (b) overlaps vocalic with consonantal articulations one landmark to the left, aligning C release (instead of offset) and V onset, the result of which is a derived secondary articulation on C (Bateman 2007).…”
Section: Articulatory Phonology-based Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14a. ALIGN(C, offset, V, onset) (Bradley 2014) In a CV sequence, align the offset of C with the onset of V.…”
Section: Articulatory Phonology-based Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimality theory (OT) has inspired linguists from different areas or fields of linguistics. Sounds system of many languages, like Spanish [1], [2], have been investigated by using this paradigm, OT. Many Arabic phonological phenomena have not received studies within the OT framework, therefore, the current study is oriented to bridge part of the gap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teniendo esto en cuenta, se vuelve razonable estudiar si la supresión de /r/ y /θ/ propicia cambios en las vocales precedentes, similares a los que se proponen para /s/ en estudios como los de Martínez Melgar (1994) y Peñalver Castillo (2006), y si los hablantes de andaluz oriental pueden identificar /-s/, /-r/ y /-θ/ subyacentes tras /i/, /e/, /a/, /o/ o /u/. En español, los fonemas /r/ y /ɾ/ solamente tienen función contrastiva en posición intervocálica y, en coda silábica, la realización fonética de éstos puede variar a través de un continuum que va desde la vibrante simple hasta la vibrante múltiple; variación esta última gobernada por particularidades estilísticas y dialectales (Blecua Falgueras 2005;Bradley 2014 (1977), Sanders (1998) y Carlson (2012, entre otros, consideran que la carga semántica de la /-s/ subyacente se mantiene mediante la abertura vocálica, con lo cual otorgan una función fonémica a las vocales abiertas del andaluz oriental. Por otro, autores como López Morales (1984) y Martínez Melgar (1986) admiten que, en andaluz oriental, las vocales se abren ante /-s/ subyacente, pero no consideran que esa abertura vocálica tenga valor fonológico.…”
unclassified