2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.comgeo.2019.101589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimally guarding 2-reflex orthogonal polyhedra by reflex edge guards

Abstract: We study the problem of guarding an orthogonal polyhedron having reflex edges in just two directions (as opposed to three) by placing guards on reflex edges only.We show that r − g 2 + 1 reflex edge guards are sufficient, where r is the number of reflex edges in a given polyhedron and g is its genus. This bound is tight for g = 0. We thereby generalize a classic planar Art Gallery theorem of O'Rourke, which states that the same upper bound holds for vertex guards in an orthogonal polygon with r reflex vertices… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted above, covering a 3-dimensional polyhedron by vertex guards may be unfeasible. There are some initial results on the minimum number of edge guards [2,5,13,27] and face guards [14,15,24,26], under the notion of weak visibility: An edge or a face f sees a point p if some point s ∈ f sees the point p. The problem formulation for edge and face guards can be further refined depending on whether (topologically) open or closed edges and faces are allowed. However, none of the current bounds is known to be tight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted above, covering a 3-dimensional polyhedron by vertex guards may be unfeasible. There are some initial results on the minimum number of edge guards [2,5,13,27] and face guards [14,15,24,26], under the notion of weak visibility: An edge or a face f sees a point p if some point s ∈ f sees the point p. The problem formulation for edge and face guards can be further refined depending on whether (topologically) open or closed edges and faces are allowed. However, none of the current bounds is known to be tight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%