2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(02)00649-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimisation of a solid-phase microextraction method for synthetic musk compounds in water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The processes which have been proposed as mainly responsible for this reduction are sorption and biodegradation. The determination of the contribution of each in the removal process, however, has rarely been investigated (García-Jares et al 2002). The most common assumption is that detected pharmaceuticals in WWTPs would be removed mainly through biodegradation and not sorption; hence, sorption process has rarely been investigated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The processes which have been proposed as mainly responsible for this reduction are sorption and biodegradation. The determination of the contribution of each in the removal process, however, has rarely been investigated (García-Jares et al 2002). The most common assumption is that detected pharmaceuticals in WWTPs would be removed mainly through biodegradation and not sorption; hence, sorption process has rarely been investigated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, for the most volatile compounds (1-27) PDMS-DVB and CAR-PDMS fibers achieved the best yields, and PDMS fiber gave the lowest extraction efficiencies. In the case of the least volatile pyrethroids (28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35), close responses were in general obtained with PDMS, PDMS-DVB, CAR-PDMS and PA fibers, while CW-DVB fiber was the least …”
Section: Influence Of the Fiber Coatingmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, Basaglia and Pietrogrande [60] preferred to use a PA fiber, justifying their choice in that PA has better resistance than PDMS for on-fiber derivatization with BSTFA. However, García-Jares et al observed better performance with (HS)SPME than with (DI)SPME for the extraction of polycyclic [85] and nitro musks [86], respectively, by using either CAR-PDMS or PDMS-DVB fibers. Wang et al [88] used (HS)SPME for extracting polycyclic musk, using a PDMS-DVB fiber based on the findings of García-Jares et al [85], and studied the influence of heating the sample by microwave radiation during the extraction, which resulted in a substantial decrease of the extraction time.…”
Section: Musk Fragrancesmentioning
confidence: 99%