2013
DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.12076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimisation of convective drying of carrots using selected processing and quality indicators

Abstract: Summary The effect of drying temperature (40–65 °C) and air rate (2–6 m s−1) on the formation of Maillard reaction indicators and vitamins content of carrots dehydrated by convection has been investigated. The range of assayed processing conditions, based on a previous central composite face design (CCD), led to moderate changes in the studied parameters, even under the most severe conditions. In addition, the drying kinetic of the process was studied taking into account the experimental quantitation of shrink… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same experimental design was reported by Ogolla et al () for spray drying of camel milk. To obtain the regression coefficients, the experimental data were fitted to a second‐order polynomial model indicated by Equation (13), with the general linear model approach: y=β0+βixi+βijxixj+βiixii2+ε, where β 0 , β i , β ii , and β ij are the regression coefficients for the intercept and the linear, quadratic, and interaction terms, respectively, while y is the response, x i and x j are the independent variables, and ε is the non‐explainable portion of variation (Gamboa‐Santos, Soria, Fornari, Villamiel, & Montilla, ; Myers, Montgomery, Vining, Borror, & Kowalski, ). The coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) was chosen to fit the polynomial equation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same experimental design was reported by Ogolla et al () for spray drying of camel milk. To obtain the regression coefficients, the experimental data were fitted to a second‐order polynomial model indicated by Equation (13), with the general linear model approach: y=β0+βixi+βijxixj+βiixii2+ε, where β 0 , β i , β ii , and β ij are the regression coefficients for the intercept and the linear, quadratic, and interaction terms, respectively, while y is the response, x i and x j are the independent variables, and ε is the non‐explainable portion of variation (Gamboa‐Santos, Soria, Fornari, Villamiel, & Montilla, ; Myers, Montgomery, Vining, Borror, & Kowalski, ). The coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) was chosen to fit the polynomial equation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of 2‐furoylmethyl‐lysine (furosine) was determined by ion‐pair reversed‐phase high‐performance liquid chromatography in a furosine‐dedicated C 8 column and an ultraviolet detector at 280 nm, based on the method of Gamboa‐Santos et al …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coating forming solutions were based on pectin gels at 3% (w/v) prepared as it described previously for the rheological analysis of samples (Samples and gel preparations section). Strawberries were coated by hand‐immersion for 2 min and the excess was dripped off for 30 s, and then the edible film was dried by convection using a computer controlled air tray dryer (SBANC, Edibon, Spain) with air rate control (AVE, 2–6 m s −1 ) at room temperature for 30 min . Control samples were not coated to enable a comparison of the effect of the coating on the fruit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations