2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-17298-4_48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimisation of Double Wishbone Suspension System Using Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Xiaohai Wang et al introduced the restricted mutation generation area into the GA, which increased the search ability of the algorithm near the optimal path in the later stage, shortened the planning time and improved the feasibility of the algorithm [9]. A. Arikere et al used multi-objective genetic algorithm to search the optimal solution of the double wishbone design problem [10]. Yubing Wang et al proposed a distributed PSO algorithm for fast convergence, random cross-search and accurate search to avoid falling into local optimization and improve algorithm performance [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xiaohai Wang et al introduced the restricted mutation generation area into the GA, which increased the search ability of the algorithm near the optimal path in the later stage, shortened the planning time and improved the feasibility of the algorithm [9]. A. Arikere et al used multi-objective genetic algorithm to search the optimal solution of the double wishbone design problem [10]. Yubing Wang et al proposed a distributed PSO algorithm for fast convergence, random cross-search and accurate search to avoid falling into local optimization and improve algorithm performance [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the mathematical relationship of the key points required for the wheel space position is obtained through derivation. If the movement of the lower swing arm is used as the system input to change the suspension mechanism, the position of each key point of the suspension system at any time can be solved by the above equations (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20), and then it can express the front wheel alignment parameters of the car suspension kinematics.…”
Section: Kinematics Analysis Of Double Wishbone Suspension and Analyt...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking the minimum deviation of the toe angle and steering angle during the wheel jump stroke period as the design goal, the position of optimal connecting rod hard point was determined, and the maximum steering error of the system was reduced to 89.6%. Arikere et al 10 deduced the spatial kinematics mathematical model of the double wishbone suspension, and suspension, and applied multi-objective planning to the design of the automobile suspension system, and in the process of wheel jump up and down, the optimization goal is to reduce the change amount of toe angle and camber angle, and obtain the non-inferior solution set of the optimization model based on the NSGA-II algorithm to improve the handling stability. Hengmin Qi et al 11 presented a comprehensive tune in terms of vehicle coupled roll and lateral dynamics by adjusting the parameters of HIS system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A substantial amount of literature also exists on the design and analysis of the more commonly used double-wishbone suspension (also known as the AA suspension), and of its short–long A (SLA) version, as well as on the kinematic synthesis of the corresponding RSSR-SS and RSSR-RRS linkages. 91115 Other than their traditional application to passenger cars, 116121 double-wishbone suspensions have found increasing use in motor coaches, trucks, agricultural tractors, and off-road vehicles. 115, 122–125 There are also reports on three-link suspension configurations that depart from what it is commonly assumed to be a double-wishbone mechanism, 129131 which are also termed multi-link suspensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the above-cited papers report on the design of multi-link 40, 57, 58 and double- wishbone 100, 103, 105, 106, 107, 109 front-suspension mechanisms through repeated analysis and the use of simulation software or computer algebra systems. Graphical 1–5,10–12 , analytical and numerical approaches 26, 48, 50, 56, 97, 101, 102, 113 to five-link, four-link, and three-link front suspension kinematic synthesis are available to the interested reader, but these methods appear to be difficult to implement and are rarely accompanied by clearly illustrated numerical examples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%