2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.07.133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimisation of the performance of a novel rotationally asymmetrical optical concentrator design for building integrated photovoltaic system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although additional rays come from the side profile of the concentrator, the optical concentration gain is distinctly lower than for direct light simulations achieving an optical concentration gain of 1.94. The optical concentration gain for direct light is 4.66 [9] and thus higher by a factor of 2.4. This is because the concentrator design was optimised for direct irradiance and the field of view is therefore limited.…”
Section: Radtirc Designmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although additional rays come from the side profile of the concentrator, the optical concentration gain is distinctly lower than for direct light simulations achieving an optical concentration gain of 1.94. The optical concentration gain for direct light is 4.66 [9] and thus higher by a factor of 2.4. This is because the concentrator design was optimised for direct irradiance and the field of view is therefore limited.…”
Section: Radtirc Designmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…As any object can be turned into a light source, a dome with a thickness of 1 mm and a 380 mm radius was created using AutoCAD. The radius corresponds to the distance between light source and concentrator during the direct light simulations [9]. The dome was created by revolving a circle section around an axis instead of using the dome function implemented in AutoCAD, which consists of planar sections.…”
Section: Radtirc Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent report by the Fraunhofer ISE indicated that the installation price of a high concentration CPV system ranges between $1.47/W and $2.32/W [49]. In a separate analysis, Abu-Bakar [51] shows that their LCPV system could reduce the installation cost by 14.5%, when compared to a traditional non-concentrating system. By 2030, it is predicted that the cost of installation for a CPV systems could range between $0.74/W and $1.16/W [49].…”
Section: Solar Concentrator: a Historic Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a smaller height than the CPC, higher concentration can be achieved approaching the theoretical maximum [82]. For a CPC and a DTIRC fabricated from the same material, with the same refractive index, height and exit aperture, the CPC will always have a larger acceptance angle [83].…”
Section: Hybrid Nonimaging Concentratorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These designs would require further development for successful application in portable solar systems in developing countries. Table 4 Comparison of static nonimaging concentrators and their suitability for portable solar Abu-Bakar [2] and Ota et al [105] suggested injection moulding as the manufacturing process and Abu-Bakar [83] concluded that PMMA has better optical properties and is cheaper than polyurethane. While polyurethane and casting was chosen by Sellami [62] and Sarmah [111] for the manufacturing of the prototype; Sellami [62] suggested using injection moulding for mass production of SEH and 3D CCP concentrators, since casting is more cost effective for small production amounts [112].…”
Section: Various Nonimaging Concentrator Designs Have Been Proposed Amentioning
confidence: 99%