“…Though all similarity coefficients are intuition based and there is no strict reasoning why one of them is better than others (Krushinsky and Goldengorin, 2012). Jaccard similarity coefficient is found the efficient and most stable one among the twenty Lian et al, 2013 Multiple identical machines, processing time, set-up time, machine capacity, production volume, cell size, alternative routes Gupta et al, 2012 Operation sequence Ahi et al, 2009 Operational time, operation sequence Pandian and Mahapatra, 2009 Operation sequence, operation time Paydar and Sahebjamnia, 2009 Operation sequence Susanto et al 2009 Sequence of operations, part-Volume, alternative routes Kumar and Jain, 2008 Operation sequence, time, production volume Masmoudi et al 2008 Alternative routes Kim et al, 2004 Machine sequence, alternative routes Mahesh and Srinivasan, 2002 Processing time, alternative routes Mukattash et al, 2002 Multiple parallel machines, processing time, alternative routes Won and Lee, 2001 Operation sequence, production volume Nair and Narendran, 1998 Operation sequence Beaulieu et al, 1997 Intra-cell movement cost, material handling cost, machine cost (alternate machines), alternative routes Beaulieu et al, 1993 Production cost, work load, machine flexibility, routing flexibility compared in a comparative study of similarity coefficients made by Yin and Yasuda (2005). For efficiency and stability of proposed CF procedure a variant of Jaccard similarity coefficient is used.…”