2010
DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2010.1784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimised hydrodynamics for membrane bioreactors with immersed flat sheet membrane modules

Abstract: A B S T R AC TSince aeration is the largest cost factor in membrane bioreactor (MBR) operation it is clear that the biggest leap towards energy and operational costs savings can be achieved by improving the use of air. Many basics of the complex two-phase fl ow in membrane modules and in the overall MBR tank as well as their interactions, however, are still poorly understood. This work focuses both on fundamental studies on shear stress exerted by rising bubbles and on optimising the geometries of tank and mod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the necessity of fluid transparency for the application of many measuring techniques and difficulties of working with real activated sludge systems, previous researchers have instead used surrogates such as water, xanthan gum solutions, yeast suspensions, and carboxylmethyl cellulose (CMC) solutions in their experiments [6,[14][15][16][17]. But the representativeness of these surrogates is questionable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Because of the necessity of fluid transparency for the application of many measuring techniques and difficulties of working with real activated sludge systems, previous researchers have instead used surrogates such as water, xanthan gum solutions, yeast suspensions, and carboxylmethyl cellulose (CMC) solutions in their experiments [6,[14][15][16][17]. But the representativeness of these surrogates is questionable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The complex interaction of hydrodynamics, mass transfer, biological degradation, and existing compounds makes it difficult to isolate all the parameters that could help in predicting membrane fouling , although the most Defrance and Jaffrin 1999;Vyas et al 2002), the filtration time (short-term vs. long-term; Yang et al 2006;Zhang et al 2006), the operating conditions and cleaning procedures (Sanguanpak et al 2015a;Trussell et al 2006;Cui et al 2003), the setup configuration (external vs. submerged; Xue et al 2015) and the initial stage of the membrane (new vs. cleaned; Le Clech et al 2003). Irrespective, MBR users have resorted to several methods to control fouling such as back-pulsing or bubbling (Prieske et al 2010), the use of additives or sponge-like carriers (Ngo et al 2008), pre-settling of biomass (Ivanovic and Leiknes 2008), sludge granulation, and membrane surface change .…”
Section: Mbr Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus, a smoother draft tube edge was introduced to achieve lower bend loss and thus higher circulation velocities (see Fig. 6) [71]. An additional acceleration was achieved by locating the aerators at the bottom of the tank instead of at the entrance to the draft tube where they significantly block the available cross section and slow down the flow.…”
Section: Optimized Modules and Aerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 5 shows numerical results (validated experimentally in [71]) on the influence of bubble size and membrane spacing in flatsheet modules on maximum shear stress exerted on the membrane surface. Values differ by a factor of up to 10, showing the importance of optimized design.…”
Section: Optimized Modules and Aerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation