1986
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.293.6558.1334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimising antiemesis in cancer chemotherapy: efficacy of continuous versus intermittent infusion of high dose metoclopramide in emesis induced by cisplatin.

Abstract: offered in early breast cancer then it becomes of paramount importance to consider the psychological impact of treatment to be offered.The degree of psychosocial morbidity among the patients treated by local excision and radiotherapy was a disappointing finding, but one which cannot be ignored. These women clearly need just as much counselling support as patients who undergo mastectomy.As more surgeons start to advocate breast conservation it is important that we have more basic research into the causal factor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…bolus doses, administration of high-dose metoclopramide, consisting of a loading dose followed by a continuous infusion up to 24 h, might also be of interest, at least for in-patients (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bolus doses, administration of high-dose metoclopramide, consisting of a loading dose followed by a continuous infusion up to 24 h, might also be of interest, at least for in-patients (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, high dose metoclopramide was taken as the standard regimen with which to compare alizapride, because it has been widely accepted at that time as the best for cisplatin induced vomiting [11,12]. Alizapride was given at the recommended dose of 5 mg kg-' day-'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A blood level of 850 ng ml-' of metoclopramide appeared to be necessary for good control of cisplatin induced nausea and vomiting (Meyer et al, 1984;Kerr et al, 1985). Not surprisingly a loading dose followed by a maintenance infusion gave more constant blood levels than intermittent administration (Taylor & Bateman, 1983) and was associated with significantly better control of nausea and vomiting and a reduction in diarrhoea (Warrington et al, 1986 cycle. In 17/22 there was no additional benefit from doses above 8 mg.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%