2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00366-003-0264-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimising cam motion using piecewise polynomials

Abstract: The

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If the τ i -set includes all analytical knots, ε p is numerically zero and the exact solution has been found to numerical precision (Table 2: m = {1, 2} and odd g). In the other case, the error can be made arbitrarily small by increasing g. The latter claim is not formally proved but numerically verified for m = 3 by solving (24) for 50 logarithmically spaced (even) g values between 10 and 1000. Figure 4 shows that the relative error ε p globally (but not monotonically) decreases for increasing g and drops just below 0.0001% for g = 1000.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…If the τ i -set includes all analytical knots, ε p is numerically zero and the exact solution has been found to numerical precision (Table 2: m = {1, 2} and odd g). In the other case, the error can be made arbitrarily small by increasing g. The latter claim is not formally proved but numerically verified for m = 3 by solving (24) for 50 logarithmically spaced (even) g values between 10 and 1000. Figure 4 shows that the relative error ε p globally (but not monotonically) decreases for increasing g and drops just below 0.0001% for g = 1000.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) for m = 3 the knots 2π{z, 1 − z} can never be part of the τ i -set for z (defined in Table 1) is an irrational number 10 . If the τ i -set includes all analytical knots, ε p is numerically zero and the exact solution has been found to numerical precision (Table 2: m = {1, 2} and odd g).…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations