1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(97)00154-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimising natural organic matter removal from low turbidity waters by controlled pH adjustment of aluminium coagulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
93
0
13

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
7
93
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Since pH control is suggested as one of the most important factors governing NOM removal in the coagulation process [25], pH control, instead of initial pH adjustment test, was performed to avoid variable coagulation pH and consequently variable organic removal efficiency [26]. The tested pH levels were in the range of 4-8, and coagulant dosages were in the range of 4-9 g/L.…”
Section: Effects Of Ph Control On Coagulation Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since pH control is suggested as one of the most important factors governing NOM removal in the coagulation process [25], pH control, instead of initial pH adjustment test, was performed to avoid variable coagulation pH and consequently variable organic removal efficiency [26]. The tested pH levels were in the range of 4-8, and coagulant dosages were in the range of 4-9 g/L.…”
Section: Effects Of Ph Control On Coagulation Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previous studies [32,33], different mechanisms or their combination may be dominant under different conditions. For Al 2 (SO 4 ) 3 , the influence of the pH on coagulation mechanisms was correlated with the coagulant hydrolysed species [11].…”
Section: Effects Of Ph On Dissolved Residual Al Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Al salts dissociate when added to water, and the charged Al hydrolysis products interact electrostatically with anionic NOM to form insoluble charge-neutral products. In operational regions, where insoluble Al hydroxide is formed, the NOM can be removed by entrapment (i.e., sweep coagulation) or surface adsorption (Gregor et al (1997), Nason and Lawler (2009)). The effectiveness of a coagulation process in removing NOM varies according to the nature of the NOM (i.e., its molecular weight, charge density, hydrophobicity and so forth), the physicochemical characteristics of the water and the operational conditions, such as the initial mixing intensity and duration (Letterman et al (1999)).…”
Section: Rapid Mixing For Nom Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, PDM is suggested as being an effective coagulation process (Zouboulis and Tzoupanos (2009) (1999)). The work conducted by Gregor et al (1997) is a good example for the EC, and they reported that adjusting the pH downwards to between 4 and 5 prior to coagulant addition will encourage the formation of soluble NOM-Al complex from low-turbidity waters. In case of most waters, therefore, acid must be added to maintain the desired coagulation pH for EC, and excess coagulant is required to improve the removal of OM.…”
Section: Fig 14 Variation In Nom Distribution Of Treated Water Withmentioning
confidence: 99%