2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimising recreation services from protected areas – Understanding the role of natural values, built infrastructure and contextual factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Divisekera (2016) indicates significant interdependencies between transport and tourism demand in Australia, New Zealand, the United States, and the United Kingdom. (c) Activities are also attractive to tourists, and tourists choose interesting destinations with more recreational activities (Heagney et al, 2018; Reintinger et al, 2016). (d) Moreover, some researchers consider that shopping is the crucial factor of tourism demand (Divisekera, 2009; Gunadhi & Boey, 1986) or at least identify it as an important part of tourism (Divisekera, 2010).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Divisekera (2016) indicates significant interdependencies between transport and tourism demand in Australia, New Zealand, the United States, and the United Kingdom. (c) Activities are also attractive to tourists, and tourists choose interesting destinations with more recreational activities (Heagney et al, 2018; Reintinger et al, 2016). (d) Moreover, some researchers consider that shopping is the crucial factor of tourism demand (Divisekera, 2009; Gunadhi & Boey, 1986) or at least identify it as an important part of tourism (Divisekera, 2010).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to inform financial decisions on the maintenance and development of recreational infrastructure, there is a growing need to valuate cultural ecosystem services from recreation at individual sites, such as protected areas [17]. First, land use decisions are typically made at this scale and need to be informed [18,19]. Second, although ecosystem services related to recreation can be delivered spatially across a wide landscape, within a matrix of diverse human social, political, and ecological interactions (e.g., [20][21][22][23]), studies looking at this large scale can only be useful in understanding the broader context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In future research, the trade-offs between planning policies and actions identified through differences in the provision of categories of ESs should be qualified in terms of losses and gains in the supply of land uses rather than of land covers, since the intensity of management and the production of wealth can only be identified through land uses, which CORINE-like spatial taxonomies do not capture. Another relevant issue that needs to be addressed is the relationship between planning policies and measures and the resulting visual landscape, which plays an important role in shaping the attractiveness of spatial contexts [44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%