2016
DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20164504012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization and comparison between two 6-DoF parallel kinematic machines for HIL simulations in wind tunnel

Abstract: Abstract. Parallel Robots are for sure the best choice for those applications in which a high accuracy and a high stiffness are required. As a matter of fact the closed-loop kinematic chains that characterize these machines guarantee a very low sensitivity of the end-effector position to the various sources of error. However the working volume of parallel kinematic machines is in general limited with respect to their dimensions. Moreover the reduced mobility range of the passive joints represents a critical as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second robot has been designed on a 1:3 scale with the same controller, electrical architecture and communication infrastructure in order to be able to develop, verify and optimize the control and safety algorithms without keeping the wind tunnel occupied. The robot design and development has been effected using modern project methodologies among which are genetic algorithm based kinematic synthesis [15,16], MSC Adams-Simulink co-simulation environment and FEM analysis [17]. The final result is a fully parallel six DOF robot, based on the Prismatic-Universal-Spherical (PUS) or (PRRS) joints configuration, actuated by six drive brushless motors through ball screw-slider connections.…”
Section: The Hil Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second robot has been designed on a 1:3 scale with the same controller, electrical architecture and communication infrastructure in order to be able to develop, verify and optimize the control and safety algorithms without keeping the wind tunnel occupied. The robot design and development has been effected using modern project methodologies among which are genetic algorithm based kinematic synthesis [15,16], MSC Adams-Simulink co-simulation environment and FEM analysis [17]. The final result is a fully parallel six DOF robot, based on the Prismatic-Universal-Spherical (PUS) or (PRRS) joints configuration, actuated by six drive brushless motors through ball screw-slider connections.…”
Section: The Hil Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one is installed below the wind tunnel floor and properly dimensioned for HIL tests in the contest of the LIFES50+ experimental activities [10][11][12]. The second robot is a 1:3 faithful scaled reproduction of the first installed in a laboratory and designed to develop, verify and optimize the control and safety algorithms without the use of the wind tunnel.…”
Section: Hexafloat Robot Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple requirements have been taken into account during the robot design and optimization. Extensive description of the optimization process is provided in [11,[13][14][15]. The result of the design process is a fully parallel six DOF robot, based on the PUS (PRRS) joints configuration, actuated by six direct drive brushless motors, that realize six prismatic joints by means of direct ballscrew-slider connection.…”
Section: Hexafloat Robot Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This topology has been selected in order to guarantee high performance in terms of dynamic response and structural properties with the view to reduce the size vertically. Within this category, the two manipulators shown in Figure 3 have been chosen and evaluated [5]. The first one is called Hexaglide, having parallel linear guides and therefore is characterized by symmetry with respect to the longitudinal median plane.…”
Section: Geometric and Kinematic Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An optimization process [5] is required in order to synthesize the geometric parameters of the two chosen robot architectures and evaluate which is the best solution. To properly set up the process, it is first necessary to identify the geometric parameters characterizing the two architectures and thereafter a function that mathematically describes the goal to be achieved.…”
Section: Kinetostatic Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%