1983
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.1983.325218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization and Design of Permanent Magnet Devices for Retaining Dental Prosthetic Appliances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to have realistic values, the range of height-to-diameter ratios utilized for the solenoids selected was 0.2 < α < 2. Thinner magnets are easily demagnetized, and thicker magnets are too far from the optimal yielding force ratio α ≈ 0.4 [17,[19][20][21]. The separation-to-diameter ratio γ α was varied from the point in which the separation between them was 100 times smaller than their diameter (γ α = 0.01) until the force was reduced to 5%.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Force Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to have realistic values, the range of height-to-diameter ratios utilized for the solenoids selected was 0.2 < α < 2. Thinner magnets are easily demagnetized, and thicker magnets are too far from the optimal yielding force ratio α ≈ 0.4 [17,[19][20][21]. The separation-to-diameter ratio γ α was varied from the point in which the separation between them was 100 times smaller than their diameter (γ α = 0.01) until the force was reduced to 5%.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Force Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, manually controlled magnetic fields were used to manipulate a magnetically tipped catheter in the vasculature [14][15][16]. Later, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to control catheter guidance remotely [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%