2006
DOI: 10.1109/tasc.2006.871307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization and Design of the Permanent Magnet Guideway With the High Temperature Superconductor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The world's first poeple carrying HTS Maglev vehicle adopted a singlepeak PMG, which was composed of two permanent magnets (PMs) with opposite magnetization directions and iron plates. A series of size optimization studies were then carried out [10]. The HTS maglev system in Germany used a similar PMG [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The world's first poeple carrying HTS Maglev vehicle adopted a singlepeak PMG, which was composed of two permanent magnets (PMs) with opposite magnetization directions and iron plates. A series of size optimization studies were then carried out [10]. The HTS maglev system in Germany used a similar PMG [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to optimize the design of the PMG of the HTS maglev vehicle system. In previous studies, many methods have been used to calculate the magnetic field distribution of PMG [17][18][19]. In order to simulate the aerodynamic resistance of high temperature superconductor maglev ETT in the future, finite element method (FEM) is used to calculate the magnetic field distribution in this paper.…”
Section: Numerical Calculation Of the Pmgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(vii) We consider that the PMs have a magnetization M PM = 7.95 × 10 5 A m −1 , which corresponds to μ 0 M PM = 1 T, and are separated a distance d PM = 0.05 m. The SC has a critical current density J c = H 0 /0.075 [31], where H 0 is the magnetic field created by a single PM, of crosssectional dimensions 0.05 × 0.05 m 2 , at the center of its surface perpendicular to the magnetization. The vertical working distance is d = 0.025 m, and, in the FC case, the cooling height is d FC = 0.05 m. These quantities, as well as the parameters that will remain fixed in the following sections, are the same as those used in our previous works [13,26], and they are chosen from those found in typical values used in experiments and other theoretical works [10,14]. Thus, the results obtained in this paper will complement our previous works and can also be compared with results from other theoretical and experimental works.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of works, both theoretical and experimental, have studied the change of levitation and guidance forces when one of the components of the levitating system is modified. On the one hand, studies can be found where different types of guideways are used, by changing the orientation or size of the permanent magnets [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. On the other hand, there are also studies in which the superconducting part is changed, by modifying the dimensions or arrangements of the bulks [11,[16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%