2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization and improvement of a front graded bandgap CuInGaSe2 solar cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The role of the Ga-profiles was also investigated by several simulation studies , that addressed different graded bandgap structures such as uniform, normal, linear, step, and double grading, among others, as well as Ga-dependent defect concentrations. These studies highlighted the importance of the shape of the bandgap profile on the performance of the solar cells, the value of the GGI minimum, and the position of the GGI minimum inside or outside the space charge region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of the Ga-profiles was also investigated by several simulation studies , that addressed different graded bandgap structures such as uniform, normal, linear, step, and double grading, among others, as well as Ga-dependent defect concentrations. These studies highlighted the importance of the shape of the bandgap profile on the performance of the solar cells, the value of the GGI minimum, and the position of the GGI minimum inside or outside the space charge region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current record efficiencies of Cu­(In,Ga)­Se 2 (CIGS) thin films are over 23%, which is comparable with those of multicrystalline silicon cells. In general, high-efficiency CIGS solar cells have a “V-shaped” Ga gradient. The back gradient can produce an electric potential variation or affinity (conduction band) variation, which makes the electrons stay away from the rear contact and decreases recombination, leading to a higher short-circuit current density ( J sc ). However, a steeper back gradient often significantly increases the Ga content (higher Ga composition) near the Mo layer, which reduces the grain size, increases lattice distortion, , and the concentration of bulk defects, such as antisite defects (Ga Cu ). These defects can form the photogenerated electrons trap, limit the open-circuit voltage ( V oc ), and deteriorate the device performance of CIGS solar cells. , Although a gentler back gradient can reduce lattice distortions, it also leads to a weak electric potential variation or affinity (conduction band) variation, which is adverse to the collection of minority carriers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When two different layers are stacked together, a generation of a built-in voltage offset ( V bi ) can be observed. The expression of this entity is given below. , V bi = E normalg 2 E normalg 1 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%