24th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering: Volume 2 2005
DOI: 10.1115/omae2005-67286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization and Time-Domain Simulation of the SEAREV Wave Energy Converter

Abstract: This paper introduces a new second generation wave energy converter concept named SEAREV [Systeme Electrique Autonome de Recuperation d’Energie des Vagues]. The working principle and linearized equations of the device are described. It is shown how energy absorption depends on the shape of the external floating body and on the mechanical characteristics of the moving mass. This allows to numerically optimize the geometry of the device. Latching control is used to further improve the capture width of the system… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…At early stages of device development, numerical models can allow rapid estimates of the energy capture performance of a device (Pizer, 1992;Josset et al, 2007;Payne et al, 2008;Kurniawan et al, 2011;Babarit et al, 2012), and provide powerful tools to gain insight in the behaviour of novel device configurations (Renzi and Dias, 2012;Alam, 2012;Farley et al, 2011;Lovas et al, 2010). The use of efficient numerical models allows extended parametric studies and optimization to be performed more rapidly than can be achieved experimentally (Malmo and Reitan, 1985;Babarit et al, 2005;Folley et al, 2007a,b;Vicente et al, 2009;Gomes et al, 2011;Oskamp and Ozkan-Haller, 2012;Falcao et al, 2012).…”
Section: Numerical Modelling Of Wave Energy Convertersmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At early stages of device development, numerical models can allow rapid estimates of the energy capture performance of a device (Pizer, 1992;Josset et al, 2007;Payne et al, 2008;Kurniawan et al, 2011;Babarit et al, 2012), and provide powerful tools to gain insight in the behaviour of novel device configurations (Renzi and Dias, 2012;Alam, 2012;Farley et al, 2011;Lovas et al, 2010). The use of efficient numerical models allows extended parametric studies and optimization to be performed more rapidly than can be achieved experimentally (Malmo and Reitan, 1985;Babarit et al, 2005;Folley et al, 2007a,b;Vicente et al, 2009;Gomes et al, 2011;Oskamp and Ozkan-Haller, 2012;Falcao et al, 2012).…”
Section: Numerical Modelling Of Wave Energy Convertersmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is the remarkable case of the nodding Duck (created by Stephen Salter, from the University of Edinburgh) ,that has been appearing since the1970s and early1980s [15] ,that are probably the best known offshore devices among those, and which of several versions were developed in the following years [16]. One of the example of this oscillating-body systems is Searev Wave energy converter developed at Ecole Centrale de Nantes, France [17], it is a floating devices that consist of a heavy horizontal-axis wheel serving as an internal gravity reference (Fig. 6 (b)).…”
Section: Pitching Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the optimization of WECs, the objective can be maximizing the yearly energy production while minimizing the production cost (Babarit et al, 2005).…”
Section: Optimization Objectives and Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kurniawan and Moan (2013) stated that for geometry design of a WEC, especially wave absorbers, the minimum of submerged surface area, submerged volume, as well as the surface curvature will lead to the lowest construction cost as well as construction difficulty. Babarit et al (2005) conducted a geometric optimization of the SEAREV by focusing two objectives: to maximize the absorbed power at a given site and to minimize the total mass in order to minimize the cost. To simplify the multi-objective problem, some researchers consider two types of ratios as simple criteria for optimizing wave absorbers: the ratio of the submerged surface area to the absorbed power and the ratio of the reaction force to the absorbed power (French et al, 1996).…”
Section: Optimization Objectives and Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%