2017
DOI: 10.1186/s40168-017-0317-z
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization and validation of sample preparation for metagenomic sequencing of viruses in clinical samples

Abstract: BackgroundSequence-specific PCR is the most common approach for virus identification in diagnostic laboratories. However, as specific PCR only detects pre-defined targets, novel virus strains or viruses not included in routine test panels will be missed. Recently, advances in high-throughput sequencing allow for virus-sequence-independent identification of entire virus populations in clinical samples, yet standardized protocols are needed to allow broad application in clinical diagnostics. Here, we describe a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Metagenomic sequencing and data analysis was performed as described previously [15,16] (Supplementary Methods). Briefly, samples were centrifuged, filtered (0.45 μm), and nuclease-treated.…”
Section: Metagenomic Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metagenomic sequencing and data analysis was performed as described previously [15,16] (Supplementary Methods). Briefly, samples were centrifuged, filtered (0.45 μm), and nuclease-treated.…”
Section: Metagenomic Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous protocols for viral enrichment and genome amplification have been described in literature [5][6][7]. Commonly employed protocols such as sample filtration [8], nuclease digestion, ultracentrifugation, and random pre-amplification of RNA or DNA in separate reactions would be particularly useful for increasing the signal-to-noise ratio in the viral analysis of biological samples in which the levels of nucleic acid background are high.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following publication of the original article [1], the authors were alerted by a colleague of a column duplication in Table 1. Since the summary row was correct, though, the interpretation and the conclusion of the article were not affected…”
Section: Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%