Optimization as a reasoning strategy for dealing with socioscientific decision‐making situations

Abstract

This paper reports on an attempt to help 12‐year‐old students develop a specific optimization strategy for selecting among possible solutions in socioscientific decision‐making situations. We have developed teaching and learning materials for elaborating this strategy, and we have implemented them in two intact classes (N = 48). Prior to and after the implementation, which lasted for nine 80‐minute sessions, we collected data through a number of open‐ended tasks that asked students either to address certain decision‐making situations or to evaluate given decisions. Twenty students (42%) also participated in follow‐up interviews. Data analysis revealed that this type of intervention may lead to an improvement in students' decision‐making reasoning strategies, starting from an early stage. Specifically, after the implementation (i) most students spontaneously selected to apply the targeted optimization strategy and provided appropriate justifications for their decisions, (ii) there was a substantial reduction in the frequency of responses that either relied on noncompensatory approaches or synthesized the available information in a nonvalid manner, and (iii) there was an improvement in students' ability to elaborate reasoning flaws in given decision‐making approaches. In addition, the findings provide insights into certain challenges and confounding factors involved in designing learning materials for promoting such reasoning strategies. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed 96:600–630, 2012

An exploratory study of informed engineering design behaviors associated with scientific explanations

“…Hence, without the reflective thought process or structures that reinforce the expressing of such thinking, learning may not be possible. Second, people in general, not just students, struggle with evaluating trade-offs (Scholten and Sherman 2006), demonstrating that such decision-making is not necessarily a naturally easy process (Papadouris 2012). Without well-constructed design problems, most students cannot consider or fully engage with the complexity of weighing trade-offs in making design decisions.…”

Fostering students’ socioscientific decision-making: exploring the effectiveness of an environmental science competition

“…Based on this result, one might wonder whether or not the BUW should offer participants more explicit guidance on how to use decision-making strategies. On the one hand, students' deliberate use of decision-making strategies is acknowledged as an important aspect when processing various information to reach an informed conclusion (e.g., Lindow & Betsch, 2019;Papadouris, 2012). On the other hand, any explicit learning intervention would reduce aspects of the selfregulated learning environment, which has been positively accentuated by participants.…”

El impacto ambiental de la alimentación: argumentos de alumnado de Magisterio y Secundaria

“…La tercera fase, analizada aquí, consistió en una tarea de elección argumentada de una dieta. El diseño incorpora la estrategia de optimización (Papadouris, 2012), cuyo objetivo es proporcionar una estructura para evaluar opciones en un proceso de toma de decisiones. Esta fase se realizó en tres sesiones de 50 minutos, estructuradas en:…”