2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2013.01.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization-based INS in-motion alignment approach for underwater vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the complicated are contained in the outputs of the inertial sensors, a coarse alignment method based on reconstructed observation vectors [5] were presented to solve the problem. In order to cope with any large angular motions, the optimization-based alignment (OBA) method has been proposed [13]- [15]. The OBA method equivalently transform the INS attitude alignment into a continuous attitude determination problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the complicated are contained in the outputs of the inertial sensors, a coarse alignment method based on reconstructed observation vectors [5] were presented to solve the problem. In order to cope with any large angular motions, the optimization-based alignment (OBA) method has been proposed [13]- [15]. The OBA method equivalently transform the INS attitude alignment into a continuous attitude determination problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in these methods, a long alignment time (more than 300 seconds) is required to ensure sufficient random noise smoothing and time intervals between two vectors to avoid collinearity and ensure solution accuracy with the dual‐vector method. The second method is attitude‐optimization‐based initial alignment, which transforms the initial alignment problem into a continuous attitude determination problem by using infinite vector observations (Ben et al., 2011; Chang, Li, & Chen, 2015; Kang, Fang, & Wang, 2013; Kang, Ye, & Song, 2014; Li, Tang, Lu, & Wu, 2013; Wu & Pan, 2013; Wu, Wu, Hu, & Hu, 2011; Zhou, Qin, Zhang, & Cheng, 2012). All these methods listed in these papers are based on the decomposition of the attitude matrix into earth motion, inertial rate, and alignment matrix, but have different vector observation constructions and alignment matrix calculation procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For underwater alignment, the vector observation is usually constructed based on the velocity integration formula in the body frame because of the adoption of the Doppler Velocity Log (DVL), which is a common auxiliary tool for underwater navigation and provides velocity measurement in the body frame. The least‐squares approach (Kang et al., 2014; Li et al., 2013) and the Kalman filtering approach (Zhou et al., 2012) are used to estimate the alignment attitude matrix. In Zhou et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytic method [13,14] and the optimization-based alignment (OBA) method [15,16] are the most common means for coarse alignment. Generally, the results of coarse alignment still have significant differences relative to the true value, and subsequent fine alignment stage intends to further enhance the accuracy of the coarse alignment by implementing state estimation methods [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%