2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2018.8460220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization Beyond the Convolution: Generalizing Spatial Relations with End-to-End Metric Learning

Abstract: To operate intelligently in domestic environments, robots require the ability to understand arbitrary spatial relations between objects and to generalize them to objects of varying sizes and shapes. In this work, we present a novel end-to-end approach to generalize spatial relations based on distance metric learning. We train a neural network to transform 3D point clouds of objects to a metric space that captures the similarity of the depicted spatial relations, using only geometric models of the objects. Our … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MSR-based systems often learn the grounding of spatial relations offline or in a separate training phase. Specific instances of QSR and MSR have been used for different tasks in robotics and computer vision, e.g., QSR relations have been extracted from videos [19], MSR and kd-trees have been used to infer spatial relations between objects [67], QSR and MSR have been compared for scene understanding on robots [58], the relative position of objects has been used to predict successful action execution [16], and methods have been developed to reason about and learn spatial relations between objects [26,28]. Specialized meetings have explored the use of natural language to describe spatial relationships between objects [11,59].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MSR-based systems often learn the grounding of spatial relations offline or in a separate training phase. Specific instances of QSR and MSR have been used for different tasks in robotics and computer vision, e.g., QSR relations have been extracted from videos [19], MSR and kd-trees have been used to infer spatial relations between objects [67], QSR and MSR have been compared for scene understanding on robots [58], the relative position of objects has been used to predict successful action execution [16], and methods have been developed to reason about and learn spatial relations between objects [26,28]. Specialized meetings have explored the use of natural language to describe spatial relationships between objects [11,59].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regards to adaption policies, we do not yet model the spatial relations amongst the actors of interest; namely, the robot (end-effector), active objects (like objects to be gripped and the packaging box), and the world (support surfaces like tables and floor). These relationships provide important context for decision making and are recently attracting more attention [51][52][53][54]. Without spatial relation understanding, the solutions learned in Exp.…”
Section: Limitations Comparisons and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learning spatial relations by relying on the geometries of objects provides a robot with the necessary capability to carry out tasks that require understanding object interactions, such as object placing [1], [2], human robot interaction [15]- [18], object manipulation [5] or generalizing spatial relations to new objects [3], [4], [19]. Commonly, spatial relations are modeled based on the geometries of objects given their point cloud models [3]- [5].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%