2014
DOI: 10.1142/s0219876213500837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization Design of Nj Shaped Guardrail Based on Collision Safety Consideration

Abstract: Cross-sectional shapes and dimensions of concrete guardrails directly influence climbing angles and directions of a car when a collision between concrete guardrail and car occurs. At the same time, contacting and climbing angles and directions influence the peak crushing force and the peak acceleration of a car body during a collision. Therefore, cross-sectional shapes and dimensions of concrete guardrails can influence the severity of injuries sustained when a collision between concrete guardrail and car occu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on prior experience or practical design requirements, the designer may know what levels of errors are acceptable for a particular problem. Most studies [36][37][38][39] state that a 2% error might be desirable, a 2-10% error is acceptable, and higher than 10% error is unacceptable. It can be seen from Figures 10 and that the RMSE CV of RBFs are less than 0.3%, which demonstrated that the prediction results of the surrogates were accurate enough for engineering design.…”
Section: Formation Of Rbf Metamodel and Accuracy Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on prior experience or practical design requirements, the designer may know what levels of errors are acceptable for a particular problem. Most studies [36][37][38][39] state that a 2% error might be desirable, a 2-10% error is acceptable, and higher than 10% error is unacceptable. It can be seen from Figures 10 and that the RMSE CV of RBFs are less than 0.3%, which demonstrated that the prediction results of the surrogates were accurate enough for engineering design.…”
Section: Formation Of Rbf Metamodel and Accuracy Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results presented were intended to improve the safety performance of longitudinal barriers. Hou et al 38 focused on the optimization of New Jersey concrete barriers based on safety assessments. In the same study, the efficiency of RBF-MQ (multi-quadratic) and RBF-LP (linear polynomial) methods were also investigated and the RBF-MQ method was found to yield more effective results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) will be unique. For constructing RBF model, some of the most commonly used basis functions [22][23][24] are: Gauss function:…”
Section: Rbf Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hou et al [24] used the FE model of Ford Taurus to establish the collision model between car and the NJ shaped guardrail, and optimized NJ shaped guardrail. Therefore, we used this FE model of Ford Taurus to set up the collision model between car and the corrugated beam guardrails.…”
Section: Car Model Effective Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, more and more high-performance extruded 7XXX series aluminum alloy profiles are applied in the car body, such as 7003 aluminum alloy, as the automotive buffer beams. erefore, the material's impact safety under high-speed impact is especially important for security reasons [1]. us, it is a major requirement to research the mechanical behavior of 7XXX series aluminum alloy under dynamic loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%