2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11081-008-9077-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization methods for advanced design of aircraft panels: a comparison

Abstract: Advanced nonlinear analyses developed for estimating structural responses for recent applications for the aerospace industry lead to expensive computational times. However optimization procedures are necessary to quickly provide optimal designs. Several possible optimization methods are available in the literature, based on either local or global approximations, which may or may not include sensitivities (gradient computations), and which may or may not be able to resort to parallelism facilities. In this pape… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimization is carried out using the optimizers available in the BOSS Quattro optimization tool box [16]. Gradient based optimization [17] will be used for this application. The required sensitivities can be computed using finite difference since due to the small number of design variable it does not lead to a prohibitive computational overhead.…”
Section: Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optimization is carried out using the optimizers available in the BOSS Quattro optimization tool box [16]. Gradient based optimization [17] will be used for this application. The required sensitivities can be computed using finite difference since due to the small number of design variable it does not lead to a prohibitive computational overhead.…”
Section: Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of a gradient-based method, an adaptive surrogate approach and a genetic algorithm, is compared. Details of these optimizers are available in [17]. The default values of the optimizers were used [16].…”
Section: Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bi-level optimization problem is defined in the BOSS Quattro environment (Radovcic and Remouchamps, 2002), as illustrated in Figure 17. For the global optimization process acting on the global geometric design variables, a surrogate based method is used (Colson et al, 2010). A data base is constructed based on the values of the computed drag and on the structural weight obtained with topology optimization.…”
Section: Application To the Aero-structural Design Of The Pylonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reader will appreciate that for confidentiality reasons, these more realistic results are not revealed here. In the surrogate-based method method (Colson et al, 2010), a response surface relying on neural networks is first determined, based on a set of available (computed) function values. The optimization is then carried out on these approximated functions, with a genetic algorithm.…”
Section: Application To the Aero-structural Design Of The Pylonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The described sizing process does not come from a single attempt at the problem, rather the process should be seen as a result of a multi-year effort in structural optimization [1][2][3][4][5][6]. For this reason it is important to first describe the history of structural optimization at AIRBUS, and show the development of ideas, which has lead to today's vision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%