2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10706-021-01834-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization Methods of Blasting Parameters of Large Cross-Section Tunnel in Horizontal Layered Rock Mass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of model tests and field investigation, Chakraborty et al [11,12] evaluated the joint direction and rock mass quality affecting tunnel overbreak and considered that blasting quality was related to the average rock mass size, depth, and geometric dimensions of the cross-sectional profile. Mei et al [13] used the horizontal layered rock mass large-section tunnel as the research object and proposed the cutting methods of "center holes and four-wedge cutting holes", "empty holes, long holes, short holes, and additional relief holes", and the fine excavation mode of the maximum single hole charging scheme. Meng et al [14] improved smooth blasting parameters and construction technology in large dip tunnels in accordance with the actual construction situation on site, the rock, and the explosive properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of model tests and field investigation, Chakraborty et al [11,12] evaluated the joint direction and rock mass quality affecting tunnel overbreak and considered that blasting quality was related to the average rock mass size, depth, and geometric dimensions of the cross-sectional profile. Mei et al [13] used the horizontal layered rock mass large-section tunnel as the research object and proposed the cutting methods of "center holes and four-wedge cutting holes", "empty holes, long holes, short holes, and additional relief holes", and the fine excavation mode of the maximum single hole charging scheme. Meng et al [14] improved smooth blasting parameters and construction technology in large dip tunnels in accordance with the actual construction situation on site, the rock, and the explosive properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The over-and underbreaks can be brought about by two main reasons: by the drilland-blast design and execution and by the geomechanical features of the rock mass [15]. Thus, many scientists in their research have raised the problem of drilling and blasting parameter selection to ensure the predefined shape of excavation [16][17][18].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ji et al (2020) proposed an inverted T-shaped hollowing and blasting method for very large cross-section tunnels, which improved the blasting effect. Mei et al (2021) carried out studies on hollowing methods, blast hole placement, charge volume, and charge structure to achieve safe and efficient blasting excavation. Zhang et al (2022) proposed an innovative hollowing and blasting technique based on cavity hollowing and debris throwing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%