2018
DOI: 10.26583/npe.2018.3.09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization models of two-component nuclear energy system with thermal and fast reactors in a closed nuclear fuel cycle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Actualized and updated data on the BFS-66, -64 and -80 assemblies were used as the basis for building detailed precision neutronic models with a description of the BFS heterogeneous structure and experimental devices for Monte Carlo based codes, including MCU-BR, MCNP, MMK-RF, and MMK-ROKOKO (Gomin et al 2000, Andrianova et al 2016, Zherdev et al 2018) with BNAB-RF and MDBBR50 neutron data, and the ROS-FOND evaluated neutron data library (Andrianova et al 2018), which allow calculating key neutronic characteristics measured at the BFS-66, -64 and -80 assemblies, and being important in terms of estimating the uncertainty of the power density in the steel reflector of a lead cooled fast reactor plant.…”
Section: Calculation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actualized and updated data on the BFS-66, -64 and -80 assemblies were used as the basis for building detailed precision neutronic models with a description of the BFS heterogeneous structure and experimental devices for Monte Carlo based codes, including MCU-BR, MCNP, MMK-RF, and MMK-ROKOKO (Gomin et al 2000, Andrianova et al 2016, Zherdev et al 2018) with BNAB-RF and MDBBR50 neutron data, and the ROS-FOND evaluated neutron data library (Andrianova et al 2018), which allow calculating key neutronic characteristics measured at the BFS-66, -64 and -80 assemblies, and being important in terms of estimating the uncertainty of the power density in the steel reflector of a lead cooled fast reactor plant.…”
Section: Calculation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following assumptions were made to model the nuclear power capacity growth for the scenario analysis: 35 GW in 2030, 55 GW in 2050, and 103 GW in 2100 (Andrianov et (Andrianov et al 2018). The cost of the NFC services was taken from (Alekseev et al 2016).…”
Section: Initial Data and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%