2016
DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2196v2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of 16S amplicon analysis using mock communities: implications for estimating community diversity

Abstract: 33The diversity of complex microbial communities can be rapidly assessed by high- defining OTUs depended on the method used for OTU picking. Our "default" analysis in QIIME 45 overestimated mock community OTU diversity by at least a factor of ten. Our optimized analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast to the single-copy housekeeping gene targeted by the rpoB marker, sequence heterogeneity between the different copies of the16S marker may lead to the amplification of numerous sequence variants during metabarcoding, resulting in the identification of excessive numbers of OTUs in 16S datasets. Intragenomic ribosomal diversity [25] or ribosomal paralogs [26] have frequently been implicated as the major source of sequence variants in 16S Illumina A B Fig. 3 Comparison of the expected bacterial composition and the observed OTU composition obtained with Illumina-amplicon rpoB sequencing in the mock1 community (FROGS process).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast to the single-copy housekeeping gene targeted by the rpoB marker, sequence heterogeneity between the different copies of the16S marker may lead to the amplification of numerous sequence variants during metabarcoding, resulting in the identification of excessive numbers of OTUs in 16S datasets. Intragenomic ribosomal diversity [25] or ribosomal paralogs [26] have frequently been implicated as the major source of sequence variants in 16S Illumina A B Fig. 3 Comparison of the expected bacterial composition and the observed OTU composition obtained with Illumina-amplicon rpoB sequencing in the mock1 community (FROGS process).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…n = 1194) of the total read abundance on a per-sample basis and that were present in < 5% (i.e. n = 12) of the total samples (Bokulich et al, 2013;Callahan et al, 2016;Krohn et al, 2016). Only OTUs assigned to the algal genus Trebouxia passed the filtering process and were thus retained for downstream analysis.…”
Section: Bioinformatic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main drawbacks are those related to primer biases, sequencing artifacts, clustering of operational taxonomic units, and contamination (Thomsen & Willerslev, 2015;Guardiola et al, 2016). Thus, care should be taken during sample collection and preparation, followed by the application of strict bioinformatic filtering steps (Krohn et al, 2016). This is particularly relevant in the case of lichens and their photobionts, to avoid or minimize the inclusion of epiphytic algae that may have landed on or within the thallus during the life cycle of the lichen but that are not a functional part of the symbiosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast to the single-copy housekeeping gene targeted by the rpoB marker, sequence heterogeneity between the different copies of the16S marker may lead to the amplification of numerous sequence variants during metabarcoding, resulting in the identification of excessive numbers of OTUs in 16S datasets. Intragenomic ribosomal diversity [25] or ribosomal paralogs [26] have frequently been implicated as the major source of sequence variants in 16S Illumina amplicon-sequencing analyses. The observed OTU inflation may also be explained by cumulative errors occurring during the amplification and sequencing steps of the metabarcoding procedure, resulting in the detection of sequence variants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%