2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of a container vessel fleet and its propulsion plant to articulate sustainable intermodal chains versus road transport

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the fact that the model assumes Ro-Ro vessels' configuration to be a fixed parameter, it evaluates not only seaborne and road haulage but also the train option. Likewise, the work carried out by Martínez-López et al [17,18,30] defined multi-objective models to evaluate the competitiveness of intermodality versus the road alternative for a particular MoS through the determination of an optimal fleet based on time, cost, and the most suitable kind of vessel (Ro-Ro or container vessel: [17]. The latter model was introduced with additional objective functions (external costs: [18] and additional capacities (the definition of the most suitable propulsion plant, fuels, and abatement systems: [30].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the fact that the model assumes Ro-Ro vessels' configuration to be a fixed parameter, it evaluates not only seaborne and road haulage but also the train option. Likewise, the work carried out by Martínez-López et al [17,18,30] defined multi-objective models to evaluate the competitiveness of intermodality versus the road alternative for a particular MoS through the determination of an optimal fleet based on time, cost, and the most suitable kind of vessel (Ro-Ro or container vessel: [17]. The latter model was introduced with additional objective functions (external costs: [18] and additional capacities (the definition of the most suitable propulsion plant, fuels, and abatement systems: [30].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, very few studies were identified from the search. Among them, two are notable due to their high capacities: the models published by Baykasoglu and Subulan [29] and Martínez-López et al [17,18,30]. All of the aforementioned models tackle competitiveness between intermodality through MoS and trucking through multiobjective approaches.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis considers the fleets shown in Table 1; optimized container vessel (capacity to 185 reefer container) [20] and conventional Ro-Pax vessels by operating both of them under SSS conditions. The focus is on the vessels' electricity balance, with the most demanding operational stage being maneuvering.…”
Section: Practical Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a wider perspective, it can be inferred that studies about intermodal transport based on the resolution of optimization models through heuristics are very scarce [6], especially taking into account the development of multi-objective models and the analysis of Pareto fronts. Among them, two are remarkable due to their high capacities: the models published by Baykasoglu and Subulan (2016) [32] and Martínez-López et al (2015, 2016 and 2018) [19,20,33]. All of them tackle the competitiveness between intermodality through MoS and trucking through multi-objective approaches.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that the model assumes Ro-Ro vessels' configuration to be a fixed parameter, it evaluates not only the seaborne and road haulage but also the train option. Likewise, the work carried out by Martínez-López et al (2015, 2016 and 2018) [19,20,33] defined multi-objective models to evaluate the competitiveness of intermodality versus the road alternative for a particular MoS in the EU context through the determination of an optimal fleet based on the time, the cost, and the most suitable kind of vessel (Ro-Ro or container vessel [19]). The latter model introduced environmental costs as an additional objective function [20] and additional capacities about the selection of the most suitable propulsion plant, fuels, and abatement systems for the vessels [33].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%